Gaines v. Virk et al

Filing 44

ORDER GRANTING Defendant's 43 Motion to Stay Proceedings signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 11/12/2019. (Orozco, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARY LEE GAINES, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 1:16-cv-01689-LJO-JLT (PC) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS v. (Doc. 43) OFFICER BEAVER, 15 Defendant. 16 Defendant Beaver requests that the Court stay the proceedings in this action until the 17 18 Court rules on its concurrently filed motion for an order requiring Plaintiff to post security 19 pursuant to Local Rule 151(b). (Doc. 43.) According to Local Rule 151(b), “[t]he provisions of 20 Title 3A, part 2, of the California Code of Civil Procedure, relating to vexatious litigants, are … 21 adopted as a procedural Rule of this Court.” Under Title 3a, when a motion for an order requiring 22 a plaintiff to post security is filed before trial, the litigation is automatically stayed. Cal. Civ. 23 Proc. Code § 391.6. In addition, the moving defendant need not plead until 10 days after the 24 motion is denied or, if granted, until 10 days after the security has been provided. Id. 25 Accordingly, Defendant also requests that the Court vacate the deadline to file a responsive 26 pleading to Plaintiff’s complaint. 27 /// 28 /// 1 Based on the foregoing, the Court ORDERS: 2 1. Defendant’s motion to stay the proceedings in this case, (Doc. 43), is GRANTED. 3 This case is STAYED until the Court rules on Defendant’s motion for an order 4 requiring Plaintiff to post security, (Doc. 42). 5 2. The deadline for Defendant to file a responsive pleading to Plaintiff’s complaint is 6 VACATED, to be reset, if appropriate. 7 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 12, 2019 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?