Gaines v. Virk et al
Filing
44
ORDER GRANTING Defendant's 43 Motion to Stay Proceedings signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 11/12/2019. (Orozco, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MARY LEE GAINES,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
1:16-cv-01689-LJO-JLT (PC)
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS
v.
(Doc. 43)
OFFICER BEAVER,
15
Defendant.
16
Defendant Beaver requests that the Court stay the proceedings in this action until the
17
18
Court rules on its concurrently filed motion for an order requiring Plaintiff to post security
19
pursuant to Local Rule 151(b). (Doc. 43.) According to Local Rule 151(b), “[t]he provisions of
20
Title 3A, part 2, of the California Code of Civil Procedure, relating to vexatious litigants, are …
21
adopted as a procedural Rule of this Court.” Under Title 3a, when a motion for an order requiring
22
a plaintiff to post security is filed before trial, the litigation is automatically stayed. Cal. Civ.
23
Proc. Code § 391.6. In addition, the moving defendant need not plead until 10 days after the
24
motion is denied or, if granted, until 10 days after the security has been provided. Id.
25
Accordingly, Defendant also requests that the Court vacate the deadline to file a responsive
26
pleading to Plaintiff’s complaint.
27
///
28
///
1
Based on the foregoing, the Court ORDERS:
2
1. Defendant’s motion to stay the proceedings in this case, (Doc. 43), is GRANTED.
3
This case is STAYED until the Court rules on Defendant’s motion for an order
4
requiring Plaintiff to post security, (Doc. 42).
5
2. The deadline for Defendant to file a responsive pleading to Plaintiff’s complaint is
6
VACATED, to be reset, if appropriate.
7
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
November 12, 2019
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?