Leslie v. Madrigal et al

Filing 51

ORDER STRIKING Plaintiff's Response to Defendants' Answer [49, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 5/6/2019. (Hellings, J)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9

DESHAWN D. LESLIE,

10

Plaintiff,

11

Case No. 1:16-cv-01698-AWI-SKO (PC)
ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S
RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS’ ANSWER

v.
(Doc. 49)

12

MADRIGAL, et al.,

13

Defendants.

14
Plaintiff, Deshawn D. Leslie, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis

15
16

in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983. On April 15, 2019, Defendants filed their

17

Answer to Plaintiff’s Fourth Amended Complaint. (Doc. 43.) On May 2, 2019, Plaintiff filed a

18

response to Defendants’ Answer. (Doc. 49.) Plaintiff does not have a right to file a

19

response/surreply to Defendants’ Answer under the Local Rules or the Federal Rules of Civil

20

Procedure. Therefore, Plaintiff=s Response to Defendants’ Answer, filed on May 2, 2019, (Doc.

21

49), is HEREBY ORDERED STRICKEN from the record.

22
23
24
25

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

May 6, 2019

/s/

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

26
27
28

Sheila K. Oberto

1

.