Leslie v. Madrigal et al

Filing 58

ORDER DENYING without prejudice 53 Motion to Initiate Discovery Proceedings ; ORDER GRANTING 54 Motion for Extension of Time,signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 5/21/2019. ( Objections to F&R due 30-Day Deadline) (Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 DESHAWN D. LESLIE, Plaintiff, 7 v. 8 9 OSCAR M. MADRIGAL, et al., Defendants. 10 1:16-cv-01698 AWI-SKO (PC) ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE OBJECTIONS TO FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING MOTION TO INITIATE DISCOVERY (Docs. 53, 54) 30-DAY DEADLINE 11 12 Plaintiff is a prisoner proceeding pro se in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1983. On May 16, 2019, Plaintiff filed a motion to extend time to file objections to findings and recommendations. Good cause having been presented to the court, this motion will be granted. However, on May 16, 2019, Plaintiff also filed a motion to initiate discovery. Discovery has not yet opened and this case is currently set for a court supervised settlement conference on June 6, 2019. If the settlement conference is not successful, a Discovery and Scheduling Order will issue which will open discovery. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff is GRANTED 30 days from the 20 21 22 23 date of service of this order in which to file objections to findings and recommendations, but Plaintiff’s motion to initiate discovery is DENIED without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 Dated: May 21, 2019 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28 1 .

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?