Ayala v. Frito Lay, Inc.
Filing
6
ORDER Granting in Part 5 Stipulation Regarding Defendant's Pending 3 Motion to Dismiss and 4 Motion to Strike Certain Allegations of the Complaint, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/7/2016. (Gaumnitz, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
REBECCA M. AYALA,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 1:16-cv-01705-DAD-SKO
v.
FRITO LAY, INC.,
15
Defendant.
16
ORDER GRANTING IN PART
STIPULATION REGARDING
DEFENDANT’S PENDING MOTION TO
DISMISS AND MOTION TO STRIKE
CERTAIN ALLEGATIONS OF THE
COMPLAINT
(Doc. No. 5)
17
18
19
Before the court is the parties’ stipulation regarding defendant Frito Lay, Inc.’s (“Frito
20
Lay”) motion to dismiss and motion strike certain allegations of the complaint. (Doc. No. 5.)
21
Having carefully reviewed the entire file and the parties’ stipulation, the court finds good cause to
22
issue an order adopting the parties’ stipulation in part. The court notes that under the parties’
23
proposed stipulation, plaintiff Rebecca M. Ayala’s operative complaint in this case (see Doc. No.
24
1-5) shall be superseded by an amended complaint, filed either (a) on or before December 29,
25
2016, or (b) no later than twenty-one days after December 29, 2016. In either event, the court
26
will not be required to reach the substance of defendant’s pending motions.
27
/////
28
/////
1
1
Accordingly,
2
1. Plaintiff Ayala’s complaint is dismissed without prejudice;
3
2. Plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint no later than January 19, 2017.
4
Upon filing an amended complaint with the court, plaintiff shall serve such pleading
5
on defendant Frito Lay, and may do so by email to its counsel of record;
6
3. Defendant may file and serve a responsive pleading within twenty-one days after
being served with plaintiff’s amended complaint; and
7
8
4. Defendant’s motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 3) and motion to strike (Doc. No. 4) are
9
10
11
denied as having been rendered moot by this order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
December 7, 2016
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?