Dustin v. Pffeiffer et al
ORDER Granting 31 Motion for Copies, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 9/19/17. (Marrujo, C)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DALE OWEN DUSTIN,
Case No. 1:16-cv-01708-DAD-SAB-HC
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR
(ECF No. 31)
Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus
18 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has been granted in forma pauperis status in the instant
19 proceeding. (ECF No. 8).
On September 11, 2017, Petitioner filed a motion for copies of the findings and
21 recommendation, which now has been vacated, and Petitioner’s objections to the findings and
22 recommendation. (ECF No. 31). Petitioner appears to allege that he does not have access to all of
23 his legal property and that some of his legal materials have been confiscated. Good cause having
24 been presented, the Court will grant the motion.
Petitioner is advised, however, that the Court will not grant any further requests for
26 copies of pleadings or other documents in the Court’s file. Should Petitioner need copies of
27 documents filed in this case, he is advised that the Schedule of Fees for the U.S. District Court
28 for the Eastern District of California requires a prepayment of fifty cents a page for documents in
1 the Court’s file. Plaintiff may file a request with the Clerk’s Office to advise him of the number
2 of pages of any documents he needs, but will not provide copies without prepayment of fees.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Petitioner’s motion for copies (ECF No. 31) is GRANTED; and
2. The Clerk’s Office is DIRECTED to send copies of the findings and recommendation
(ECF No. 26) and Petitioner’s objections (ECF No. 27) to Petitioner.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
September 19, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?