Schlyter v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 6

ORDER that Plaintiff file amended application to proceed in Forma Pauperis, pay filing fee, or SHOW CAUSE why case should not be dismissed. By no later than February 10, 2017, Plaintiff shall (1) file an amended application to proceed in for ma pauperis that fully responds to all applicable questions, including questions numbered 4 through 8; (2) pay the $400 filing fee; or (3) file a statement showing cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to comply with the Courts order. Failure to respond to this Order to Show Cause will result in dismissal of this action. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 2/3/2017. (Thorp, J)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9

LINDA LEE SCHLYTER,

10

Plaintiff,

11

v.

12
13
14
15
16

Case No. 1:16-cv-01710-SKO
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF FILE
AMENDED APPLICATION TO
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, PAY
FILING FEE, OR SHOW CAUSE WHY
CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
_____________________________________/
Plaintiff Linda Lee Schlyter filed a complaint on November 9, 2016, along with an

17 application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (Docs. 1 & 3.) On
18 November 16, 2016, the Court ordered Plaintiff to file an amended application to proceed in forma
19 pauperis that set forth answers to questions numbered 4 through 8 regarding amount of cash or
20 money in a checking or savings account (question number 4), items of value owned (question
21 number 5), regular monthly expenses (question number 6), dependents (question number 7), and
22 debts (question number 8). (Doc. 5.) Plaintiff’s amended application was due to be filed “within
23 28 days from the date” of the order, or by December 13, 2016. (See id.)
24

No amended application was filed December 13, 2016. (See Docket.) As such, by no

25 later than February 10, 2017, Plaintiff shall (1) file an amended application to proceed in forma
26 pauperis that fully responds to all applicable questions, including questions numbered 4 through 8;
27 (2) pay the $400 filing fee; or (3) file a statement showing cause why this case should not be
28

1 dismissed for failure to comply with the Court’s order. Failure to respond to this Order to Show
2 Cause will result in dismissal of this action.
3
4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5 Dated:
6

February 3, 2017

/s/

Sheila K. Oberto

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

.