Davis et al v. Clarksean

Filing 44

ORDER on Joint Stipulation to Dismiss the Matter with Prejudice, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 11/22/17. CASE CLOSED. (Gonzalez, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

PAUL DAVIS, as Trustee for the JOHNSON)
FAMILY TRUST and JOHNSON FAMILY)
ADMINISTRATIVE TRUST, and executor of the)
Estate of Robert E. Johnson, Sr., a resident of)
Washington; ROBERT E. JOHNSON FAMILY)
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a California Limited)
Partnership,
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
v.
)
)
THOMAS CLARKSEAN, an individual,
)
)
Defendant.
)
_______________________________
)
)
)
THOMAS CLARKSEAN, an individual,
)
)
Cross-Claim Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
ROBERT E JOHNSON, JR. aka BRADLEY E.)
JOHNSON, RUTH JOHNSON aka RUTH)
WALTHER, GREGORY BRAUN and ERROL)
GENE SHAW,
)
)
Cross-Claim Defendants.
)
)
)
)

CASE NO.: 1:16-CV-01724-SKO

ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION TO DISMISS
THE MATTER WITH PREJUDICE
(Doc. 42)

27
28
1
Order on Joint Stipulation to Dismiss the Matter with Prejudice

1

On November 21, 2017, the parties filed a Joint Stipulation to Dismiss, indicating that the parties

2

have resolved the matter in its entirety through the Court’s voluntary dispute resolution program, and

3

requesting dismissal with prejudice with each party to bear their own respective attorneys’ fees and costs.

4

(Doc. 42.)

5

In light of the parties’ stipulation, this action has been terminated, see Fed. R. Civ. P.

6

41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with

7

prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.

8
9
10
11

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

November 22, 2017

/s/

Sheila K. Oberto

.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Order on Joint Stipulation to Dismiss the Matter with Prejudice