Cleveland v. Hunton et al

Filing 25

ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS TIME TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT. IT IS SO ORDERED that the Defendants time to respond to the Second Amended Complaint is extended to and including September 22, 2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 8/24/2017. (Hernandez, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney JEFFREY J. LODGE Assistant United States Attorney 2500 Tulare Street, Suite 4401 Fresno, California 93721 Telephone: (559) 497-4000 Facsimile: (559) 497-4099 5 6 7 Attorneys for Thomas C. Hunton, in his official capacity as Farm Loan Manger for the United States Department of Agriculture, Farm Service Agency UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 TIMOTHY CLEVELAND, 11 ) Case No. 1:16-cv-01732-AWI-SAB ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 THOMAS C. HUNTON, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 EX PARTE REQUEST TO EXTEND DEFENDANT’S TIME TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; ORDER 17 18 The United States requests an extension of time for Thomas C. Hunton, in his official capacity 19 as Farm Loan Manger for the United States Department of Agriculture, Farm Service Agency, 20 (“Defendant”) to respond to the Second Amended Complaint of Timothy Cleveland (“Plaintiff”), 21 proceeding pro se, based on the following: 22 1. The defendant is an employee of the United States Department of Agriculture. He has 23 been sued in his official capacity under the Administrative Procedures Act (“APA”), based upon the 24 agency’s review of the decision to accelerate plaintiff’s loan. The defendant will be represented by 25 the United States Attorney's Office. 26 2. The Court recently entered an Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations and 27 Dismissing Certain Defendants and Claims. Doc. 13, 15. Additional time is required to gather 28 administrative records and discuss the alternatives, including whether to file a motion to dismiss 29 30 1 1 because the plaintiff did not complete the administrative review process before filing the complaint 2 and whether any plausible basis for relief exists. 3. 3 In light of the foregoing, and to enable the United States Attorney's Office to respond 4 to the second amended complaint, it is respectfully requested that the Court extend the defendant’s 5 time to respond by approximately thirty (30) days to and including September 22, 2017. Respectfully submitted, 6 7 Dated: August 24, 2017 PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney 8 9 By: 10 11 ORDER 12 IT IS SO ORDERED that the Defendant’s time to respond to the Second Amended Complaint 13 14 /s/Jeffrey J. Lodge JEFFREY J. LODGE Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorneys for the United States is extended to and including September 22, 2017. 15 16 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 24, 2017 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?