Cleveland v. Hunton et al
Filing
8
ORDER STRIKING First Amended Complaint for Lack of Signature, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 1/24/17. Fourteen Day Deadline. (Marrujo, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
TIMOTHY CLEVELAND,
Case No. 1:16-cv-01732-AWI-SAB
Plaintiff,
12
ORDER STRIKING FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT FOR LACK OF SIGNATURE
v.
13
(ECF No. 7)
14
THOMAS C. HUNTON, et al.,
FOURTEEN DAY DEADLINE
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff Timothy Cleveland filed a complaint in this action on January 16, 2016 that was
18 dismissed for failure to state a claim. On January 23, 2017, Plaintiff Timothy Cleveland filed a
19 first amended complaint in this action. However, Plaintiff’s first amended complaint is not
20 signed.
21
The Federal Rules require that every pleading must be signed by at least one attorney of
22 record or by the party personally if the party is unrepresented. Fedl. R. Civ. P. 11(a); see also
23 Local Rule 131(b) (in relevant part, all pleadings must be signed by the party involved if that
24 party is appearing in propria persona). The Court must strike any unsigned paper unless the
25 omission is promptly corrected.
Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(a).
Unsigned documents cannot be
26 considered by the Court, and Plaintiff’s complaint shall be stricken from the record on that
27 ground. Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(a); Local Rule 131(b).
28 / / /
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
Plaintiff’s unsigned first amended complaint, filed January 23, 2017, is
STRICKEN FROM THE RECORD;
3
2.
4
Plaintiff shall file a first amended complaint within fourteen (14) days from the
date of service of this order; and
5
3.
6
Failure to file an amended complaint in compliance with this order will result in
the recommendation that this action be dismissed.
7
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
10 Dated:
January 24, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?