Mohamed et al v. Lynch et al
Filing
23
THIRD JOINT STIPULATION and ORDER re EXTENSION OF TIME. Defendants are granted a 30-day extension of time for filing a response to the Complaint (Doc. 1). Defendants shall file a response to the Complaint on or before July 21, 2017. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 6/21/2017. (Timken, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
PHILLIP A. TALBERT
United States Attorney
AUDREY B. HEMESATH
Assistant United States Attorney
501 I Street, Suite 10-100
Sacramento, CA 95814
Telephone: (916) 554-2700
Email: Audrey.Hemesath@usdoj.gov
16
CHAD A. READLER
Acting Assistant Attorney General
WILLIAM C. PEACHEY
Director
SARAH L. VUONG
Senior Litigation Counsel
ADRIENNE ZACK
Trial Attorney
United States Department of Justice
Civil Division
Office of Immigration Litigation
District Court Section
P.O. Box 868, Ben Franklin Station
Washington, D.C. 20044-0868
Telephone: (202) 598-2446
Facsimile: (202) 305-7000
adrienne.m.zack@usdoj.gov
17
Attorneys for Defendants
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
18
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
19
20
21
EBTISAM ALI MOHAMED and JAMAL
SALEH ALMUHARRAK,
Plaintiffs,
22
23
24
v.
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, et al.,1
25
Defendants.
26
27
28
)
) Case No.: 1:16-cv-1735-DAD-SKO
)
)
)
) THIRD JOINT STIPULATION AND
) ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME
)
)
)
)
1
On February 9, 2017, Jefferson B. Sessions III was sworn in as Attorney General of the United
States, automatically substituting for Loretta Lynch, former Attorney General, as a party in
accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(d).
Third Jt. Stip. to Extend Time
1
1
On November 14, 2016, Plaintiffs filed the instant action, seeking to compel adjudication
2
of Plaintiffs’ immigrant visa petition and application. Service on the U.S. Attorney’s Office was
3
perfected on December 21, 2016. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services reviewed
4
Plaintiffs’ file and reaffirmed the visa petition. The National Visa Center transferred the file to
5
6
the consular post at which Plaintiff Almuharrak previously made his application. At Plaintiff
7
Almuharrak’s request, his application was transferred to another consular post. The parties are in
8
the process of obtaining and submitting the necessary documentation regarding Plaintiff
9
Almuharrak’s medical examination and scheduling the re-interview of Plaintiff Almuharrak so
10
that his visa application may be adjudicated once again. Presently, Defendants’ response is due
11
12
June 21, 2017. Two previous extensions have been obtained, totaling 120 days. See ECF Nos.
13
18, 21. The parties hereby stipulate to a 30-day extension to answer or otherwise respond to the
14
complaint, until July 21, 2017.
15
Dated: June 20, 2017
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Julie A. Goldberg
(as authorized on 6/20/17)
JULIE A. GOLDBERG
5586 Broadway
Third Floor
Bronx, NY 10463
Telephone: (718) 432-1022
Facsimile: (718) 432-1044
PHILLIP A. TALBERT
United States Attorney
AUDREY B. HEMESATH
Assistant United States Attorney
16
17
18
19
20
21
CHAD A. READLER
Acting Assistant Attorney General
WILLIAM C. PEACHEY
Director
22
23
SARAH L. VUONG
Senior Litigation Counsel
24
/s/ Adrienne Zack
ADRIENNE ZACK
Trial Attorney
United States Department of Justice
Civil Division
Office of Immigration Litigation
25
26
27
28
Third Jt. Stip. to Extend Time
2
District Court Section
P.O. Box 868, Ben Franklin Station
Washington, D.C. 20044-0868
Telephone: (202) 598-2446
adrienne.m.zack@usdoj.gov
1
2
3
4
5
ORDER
6
Based on the parties’ above stipulation (Doc. 22), and for good cause shown, IT IS
7
8
HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants are granted a 30-day extension of time for filing a
9
response to the Complaint (Doc. 1). Defendants shall file a response to the Complaint on or
10
before July 21, 2017.
11
12
IT IS SO ORDERED.
13
14
Dated:
June 21, 2017
/s/
Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Third Jt. Stip. to Extend Time
3
.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?