Mohamed et al v. Lynch et al

Filing 23

THIRD JOINT STIPULATION and ORDER re EXTENSION OF TIME. Defendants are granted a 30-day extension of time for filing a response to the Complaint (Doc. 1). Defendants shall file a response to the Complaint on or before July 21, 2017. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 6/21/2017. (Timken, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney AUDREY B. HEMESATH Assistant United States Attorney 501 I Street, Suite 10-100 Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: (916) 554-2700 Email: Audrey.Hemesath@usdoj.gov 16 CHAD A. READLER Acting Assistant Attorney General WILLIAM C. PEACHEY Director SARAH L. VUONG Senior Litigation Counsel ADRIENNE ZACK Trial Attorney United States Department of Justice Civil Division Office of Immigration Litigation District Court Section P.O. Box 868, Ben Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044-0868 Telephone: (202) 598-2446 Facsimile: (202) 305-7000 adrienne.m.zack@usdoj.gov 17 Attorneys for Defendants 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 19 20 21 EBTISAM ALI MOHAMED and JAMAL SALEH ALMUHARRAK, Plaintiffs, 22 23 24 v. JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, et al.,1 25 Defendants. 26 27 28 ) ) Case No.: 1:16-cv-1735-DAD-SKO ) ) ) ) THIRD JOINT STIPULATION AND ) ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME ) ) ) ) 1 On February 9, 2017, Jefferson B. Sessions III was sworn in as Attorney General of the United States, automatically substituting for Loretta Lynch, former Attorney General, as a party in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(d). Third Jt. Stip. to Extend Time 1 1 On November 14, 2016, Plaintiffs filed the instant action, seeking to compel adjudication 2 of Plaintiffs’ immigrant visa petition and application. Service on the U.S. Attorney’s Office was 3 perfected on December 21, 2016. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services reviewed 4 Plaintiffs’ file and reaffirmed the visa petition. The National Visa Center transferred the file to 5 6 the consular post at which Plaintiff Almuharrak previously made his application. At Plaintiff 7 Almuharrak’s request, his application was transferred to another consular post. The parties are in 8 the process of obtaining and submitting the necessary documentation regarding Plaintiff 9 Almuharrak’s medical examination and scheduling the re-interview of Plaintiff Almuharrak so 10 that his visa application may be adjudicated once again. Presently, Defendants’ response is due 11 12 June 21, 2017. Two previous extensions have been obtained, totaling 120 days. See ECF Nos. 13 18, 21. The parties hereby stipulate to a 30-day extension to answer or otherwise respond to the 14 complaint, until July 21, 2017. 15 Dated: June 20, 2017 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Julie A. Goldberg (as authorized on 6/20/17) JULIE A. GOLDBERG 5586 Broadway Third Floor Bronx, NY 10463 Telephone: (718) 432-1022 Facsimile: (718) 432-1044 PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney AUDREY B. HEMESATH Assistant United States Attorney 16 17 18 19 20 21 CHAD A. READLER Acting Assistant Attorney General WILLIAM C. PEACHEY Director 22 23 SARAH L. VUONG Senior Litigation Counsel 24 /s/ Adrienne Zack ADRIENNE ZACK Trial Attorney United States Department of Justice Civil Division Office of Immigration Litigation 25 26 27 28 Third Jt. Stip. to Extend Time 2 District Court Section P.O. Box 868, Ben Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044-0868 Telephone: (202) 598-2446 adrienne.m.zack@usdoj.gov 1 2 3 4 5 ORDER 6 Based on the parties’ above stipulation (Doc. 22), and for good cause shown, IT IS 7 8 HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants are granted a 30-day extension of time for filing a 9 response to the Complaint (Doc. 1). Defendants shall file a response to the Complaint on or 10 before July 21, 2017. 11 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 14 Dated: June 21, 2017 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Third Jt. Stip. to Extend Time 3 .

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?