Asberry v. Biter
Filing
115
ORDER denying 105 Motion for separate Deposition hearings signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 3/30/2018. (Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
TONY ASBERRY,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
Case No. 1:16-cv-01741-LJO-MJS (PC)
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR SEPARATE
DEPOSITION HEARINGS
v.
(ECF NO. 105)
MARTIN BITER, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
18
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil
19
rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The action proceeds on the following
20
claims: an Eighth Amendment claim for deliberate indifference to a serious medical need
21
against defendants Lozovoy and Relevante, an Eighth Amendment conditions of
22
confinement claim against defendants Ferris and Godfrey, and a First Amendment
23
retaliation claim against defendants Ferris and Godfrey.
24
Before the Court is Plaintiff’s March 5, 2018 motion seeking to be deposed on his
25
claims against Lozovoy and Relevante separately from his claims against Ferris and
26
Godfrey. (ECF No. 105.) Defendants respond to the motion stating that the issue was
27
28
1
resolved informally and Plaintiff’s deposition was conducted without incident on March
2
14, 2018. (ECF No. 109.) Plaintiff filed no response.
3
4
In light of Defendants’ representations, Plaintiff’s motion is moot and on that basis
is HEREBY DENIED.
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
March 30, 2018
/s/
8
Michael J. Seng
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?