Asberry v. Biter

Filing 115

ORDER denying 105 Motion for separate Deposition hearings signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 3/30/2018. (Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TONY ASBERRY, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 Case No. 1:16-cv-01741-LJO-MJS (PC) ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR SEPARATE DEPOSITION HEARINGS v. (ECF NO. 105) MARTIN BITER, et al., Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil 19 rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The action proceeds on the following 20 claims: an Eighth Amendment claim for deliberate indifference to a serious medical need 21 against defendants Lozovoy and Relevante, an Eighth Amendment conditions of 22 confinement claim against defendants Ferris and Godfrey, and a First Amendment 23 retaliation claim against defendants Ferris and Godfrey. 24 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s March 5, 2018 motion seeking to be deposed on his 25 claims against Lozovoy and Relevante separately from his claims against Ferris and 26 Godfrey. (ECF No. 105.) Defendants respond to the motion stating that the issue was 27 28 1 resolved informally and Plaintiff’s deposition was conducted without incident on March 2 14, 2018. (ECF No. 109.) Plaintiff filed no response. 3 4 In light of Defendants’ representations, Plaintiff’s motion is moot and on that basis is HEREBY DENIED. 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 30, 2018 /s/ 8 Michael J. Seng UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?