Asberry v. Biter

Filing 232

ORDER GRANTING 227 Plaintiff's Motion for Clarification, signed by Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta on 1/13/2021. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 TONY ASBERRY, Plaintiff, 10 11 12 13 Case No. 1:16-cv-01741-NONE-HBK ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’s MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION v. C. RELEVANTE, et al., Defendants. 14 15 16 17 Plaintiff Tony Asberry is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action. Pending is 18 Plaintiff’s motion for clarification filed December 6, 2021. (Doc. No. 227). In his motion, 19 Plaintiff points out that the Court in its November 12, 2021 Order (Doc. No. 226) in setting forth 20 the procedural posture of this case incorrectly stated that he did file motions for summary. (Doc. 21 No. 227 at 2). Upon re-review of the docket, Plaintiff did indeed file motions for summary 22 judgement. (Doc. Nos. 116, 117 and 125). However, because his motions were denied (Doc. 23 Nos. 148, 152), this case remains postured for trial. Plaintiff’s motion for clarification is granted 24 to the extent the November 12, 2021 Order failed to accurately state that Plaintiff did move for 25 summary judgment. 26 Plaintiff also seeks clarification on the Court’s instruction that he file a second amended 27 pretrial statement. (Doc. No.227 at 2). Plaintiff points out he previously filed a pretrial statement 28 and an amended pretrial statement and believed his previous filings were proper. The Court 1 1 directed Plaintiff to file a single free-standing pretrial statement because the Court does not accept 2 piecemeal pleadings. On December 27, 2021, Plaintiff filed a second amended pretrial statement. 3 (Doc. No. 230). Thus, Plaintiff properly complied with the Court’s Order (Doc. No. 226) and no 4 further clarification appears necessary. 5 Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 6 Plaintiff’s motion for clarification (Doc. No. 227) is granted to the limited extent set forth 7 herein. 8 9 10 Dated: January 13, 2022 HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?