Asberry v. Biter
Filing
232
ORDER GRANTING 227 Plaintiff's Motion for Clarification, signed by Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta on 1/13/2021. (Marrujo, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
TONY ASBERRY,
Plaintiff,
10
11
12
13
Case No. 1:16-cv-01741-NONE-HBK
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’s MOTION
FOR CLARIFICATION
v.
C. RELEVANTE, et al.,
Defendants.
14
15
16
17
Plaintiff Tony Asberry is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action. Pending is
18
Plaintiff’s motion for clarification filed December 6, 2021. (Doc. No. 227). In his motion,
19
Plaintiff points out that the Court in its November 12, 2021 Order (Doc. No. 226) in setting forth
20
the procedural posture of this case incorrectly stated that he did file motions for summary. (Doc.
21
No. 227 at 2). Upon re-review of the docket, Plaintiff did indeed file motions for summary
22
judgement. (Doc. Nos. 116, 117 and 125). However, because his motions were denied (Doc.
23
Nos. 148, 152), this case remains postured for trial. Plaintiff’s motion for clarification is granted
24
to the extent the November 12, 2021 Order failed to accurately state that Plaintiff did move for
25
summary judgment.
26
Plaintiff also seeks clarification on the Court’s instruction that he file a second amended
27
pretrial statement. (Doc. No.227 at 2). Plaintiff points out he previously filed a pretrial statement
28
and an amended pretrial statement and believed his previous filings were proper. The Court
1
1
directed Plaintiff to file a single free-standing pretrial statement because the Court does not accept
2
piecemeal pleadings. On December 27, 2021, Plaintiff filed a second amended pretrial statement.
3
(Doc. No. 230). Thus, Plaintiff properly complied with the Court’s Order (Doc. No. 226) and no
4
further clarification appears necessary.
5
Accordingly, it is ORDERED:
6
Plaintiff’s motion for clarification (Doc. No. 227) is granted to the limited extent set forth
7
herein.
8
9
10
Dated:
January 13, 2022
HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?