Asberry v. Biter
Filing
267
ORDER construing Plaintiff's Pleading as a New Complaint; directing Clerk of Court to open New Case and Transfer Pleading; directing Plaintiff to pay filing fee, file Application to proceed IFP, or Notice in New Action within 30-Days 263 signed by Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta on 10/24/2022. (Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
TONY ASBERRY,
12
Plaintiff,
13
Case No. 1:16-cv-01741-JLT-HBK
ORDER CONSTRUING PLAINTIFF’S
PLEADING AS A NEW COMPLAINT
v.
14
C. RELEVANTE, et al.,
15
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO
OPEN NEW CASE AND TRANSFER
PLEADING
Defendants.
17
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO PAY
FILING FEE, FILE APPLICATION TO
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, OR
NOTICE IN NEW ACTION
18
THIRTY DAY DEADLINE
19
(Doc. No. 263)
16
20
21
22
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s pro se pleading titled “Motion for Emergency
23
Order to Prevent Wrongful Death or Serious Injuries” filed on October 21, 2022. (Doc. No. 263,
24
“Pleading”). According to the Pleading, Plaintiff recently was transferred to Wasco State Prison
25
(“WSP”) and believes his “life is in danger” and/or he faces “serious injury.”1 (Id. at 1-2).
26
Specifically, Plaintiff complains about the condition of his cell at WSP. (See generally id.).
27
1
28
The Court separately notified appropriate correctional officials of the allegations of death and imminent harm
contained in the Motion.
1
Plaintiff describes his assigned cell as having multiple issues to include spiders, spider webs,
2
“roaches,” “black bugs and big red bugs,” feces in the toilet, and mold and mildew on the
3
mattress. (Id. at 2). Plaintiff purportedly cleaned the cell, but it took him “late into the night.”
4
(Id.). Further, Plaintiff’s cell does not have a desk and his ceiling light would not turn off causing
5
him to tie a t-shirt over his eyes at night. (Id. at 2-3). Plaintiff alleges his safety is in jeopardy
6
due to his status as a disabled inmate and he suspects he is being “set-up” for “murder.” (Id. at 5-
7
6). Plaintiff attaches a declaration in support of his Pleading . (Id. at 20-23). As relief, Plaintiff
8
seeks an “an emergency court order to prevent death.” (Id. at 25).
9
Plaintiff’s operative complaint in the instant action involves claims of deliberate
10
indifference to Plaintiff’s serious medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment and
11
retaliation in violation of the First Amendment stemming from events that occurred at Kern
12
Valley State Prison. (Doc. Nos. 1, 17, 18). This case is procedurally postured for trial. (Doc.
13
No. 264). The claims alleged in the instant Pleading involve unrelated events at a different
14
correctional institution and challenge the conditions of Plaintiff’s current confinement. (See
15
generally Doc. No. 263)). Consequently, the Court liberally construes the Pleading as a
16
complaint concerning the conditions of Plaintiff’s confinement at WSP, which should have been
17
filed in a new action. Thus, the Court will direct the Clerk to open a new civil action and transfer
18
the Pleading to the new action as Plaintiff’s construed complaint. If Plaintiff wishes to proceed in
19
this new action he shall either pay the $402 filing fee or file the enclosed application to proceed
20
informa pauperis within thirty (30) days of receipt of this Order and the Court will then screen the
21
construed complaint.
22
Accordingly, it is ORDERED:
23
1. The Court liberally construes Plaintiff’s Pleading (Doc. No. 263) as a new civil rights
24
complaint challenging the conditions of his confinement at WSP seeking emergency
25
relief and directs the Clerk of Court to open a new prisoner civil rights action.
26
2. The Clerk shall place a copy of this Order as Document No. 1 in the newly opened
27
action and place a copy of the Motion (Doc. No. 263) as Document No. 2 in the newly
28
opened action and title it “Plaintiff’s construed civil rights complaint seeking
2
1
emergency relief.” The Clerk shall then strike the Pleading from this docket and
2
provide Plaintiff with notice of the new civil case number and a blank application to
3
proceed in forma pauperis.
4
3. Within thirty (30) days of receipt of this Order, Plaintiff shall either pay the $402
5
filing fee or file the enclosed application to proceed in forma pauperis if he wishes to
6
proceed on his new civil rights complaint challenging the conditions of his
7
confinement at WSP seeking emergency relief. Otherwise, Plaintiff shall file a
8
“Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Under Rule 41” if he does not wish to proceed in a
9
new action.
4. Plaintiff’s failure to timely pay the $402 filing fee, file an application to proceed in
10
11
forma pauperis or file a “Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Under Rule 41” will result in
12
a recommendation to dismiss the new action for Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute the new
13
action.
14
15
16
Dated:
October 24, 2022
HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?