Asberry v. Biter

Filing 272

ORDER DENYING 271 Plaintiff's Request for Copy of Docket Sheet, signed by District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 11/03/2022.(Maldonado, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TONY ASBERRY, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 v. C. RELEVANTE, et al., Defendants. 16 17 18 19 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:16-cv-01741-JLT-HBK (PC) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR COPY OF DOCKET SHEET (Doc. 271) Tony Asberry is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 27, 2022, Plaintiff filed a request for a copy of all docket entries in this matter. As 20 the Plaintiff was previously informed, this request should be directed to the clerk’s office. (See Doc. 21 208.) As the Court explained, “Plaintiff is reminded that ‘proceeding in forma pauperis does not 22 entitle a party to the waiver of anything other than court filing fees.’ Martin v. McNut, 2011 WL 23 4543039, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Sept. 28, 2011). Nor does plaintiff’s pro se or prisoner status entitle him to 24 receive complimentary copies. Blair v. CDCR, 2018 WL 1959532, at *6 f. 2 (E.D. Cal. Apr. 25, 2018). 25 Consistent with statute, the court will provide copies of documents and the docket sheet at $0.50 per 26 page. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914. Checks in the exact amount are payable to ‘Clerk, USDC.’” (Doc. 208 at 27 4.) The docket is 26 pages in length. Thus, to the extent Plaintiff wishes to obtain a copy of the docket 28 sheet, he should forward a check in the amount of $13.00 to the Clerk with his request for the same. 1 1 Accordingly, the Court ORDERS: 2 1. Plaintiff’s request to obtain a copy of the docket sheet in this matter (Doc. 271) is DENIED. 3 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 3, 2022 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?