Asberry v. Biter

Filing 37

ORDER Requiring Counsel for Defendants Lozovoy and Relevante to File Declaration Explaining Apparent Delay Within Ten (10) Days signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 7/19/2017. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TONY ASBERRY, 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, v. WARDEN BITER, et al., CASE NO. 1:16-cv-01741-DAD-MJS (PC) ORDER REQUIRING COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS LOZOVOY AND RELEVANTE TO FILE DECLARATION EXPLAINING APPARENT DELAY Ten (10) DAY DEADLINE Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil 18 rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The action proceeds on Plaintiff’s 19 Eighth Amendment claim for medical indifference against Defendants Lozovoy and 20 Relevante and Eighth Amendment conditions of confinement and First Amendment 21 retaliation claims against Defendants Ferris and Godfrey. 22 On May 18, 2017, one day before the original deadline for responsive pleadings 23 to be filed, counsel for Defendants filed a motion for a sixty day extension of time to file a 24 25 responsive pleading to Plaintiff’s complaint because of “the potential need to retain outside counsel for one or more Defendants . . . .” (Id.) The Court granted that request, 26 requiring Defendants to file responsive pleadings by July 18, 2017. (ECF No. 27.) 27 28 1 On July 14, 2017, three court days before the extended deadline for Defendants’ 2 responses, Defendants Ferris and Godfrey’s newly retained counsel filed a further 3 motion for an additional thirty-one day extension of time to answer. (ECF No. 34.) An 4 attached declaration by counsel for Defendants Ferris and Godfrey’s indicates it was not 5 until July 10, 2017, eight days before the end of the 60 day extension, that his firm was 6 asked to represent Defendants Ferris and Godfrey.. (Id.) 7 Districts courts have the inherent power and authority to control their dockets and 8 sanction unnecessary delay. The Court hereby directs counsel for Defendants Lozovoy 9 and Relevante to file, within ten days of the date of this Order, a declaration under 10 penalty of perjury explaining the apparent delay in retaining outside counsel for 11 Defendants Ferris and Godfrey’s until the end of the extended time granted for doing so. 12 The Court will consider the contents thereof in determining whether to issue an order to 13 show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for such apparent delay. 14 Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED THAT counsel for Defendants 15 Lozovoy and Relevante shall, within ten days of this Order, file a declaration as above 16 directed. 17 18 19 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 19, 2017 /s/ 20 Michael J. Seng UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?