Asberry v. Biter

Filing 56

ORDER DECLINING to Impose Sanctions on Counsel for Defendants Lozovoy and Relevante signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 8/18/2017. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TONY ASBERRY, 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, v. WARDEN BITER, et al., CASE NO. 1:16-cv-01741-DAD-MJS (PC) ORDER DECLINING TO IMPOSE SANCTIONS ON COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS LOZOVOY AND RELEVANTE Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil 19 rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The action proceeds on Plaintiff’s 20 Eighth Amendment claim for medical indifference against Defendants Lozovoy and 21 Relevante and Eighth Amendment conditions of confinement and First Amendment 22 retaliation claims against Defendants Ferris and Godfrey. 23 On July 20, 2017, the Court ordered counsel for Defendants Lozovoy and 24 Relevante to file a declaration explaining the apparent delay in retaining counsel for 25 Defendants Ferris and Godfrey in this litigation. (ECF No. 37.) On July 27, 2017, counsel 26 for Defendants Lozovoy and Relevante filed a declaration reasonably explaining the said 27 delay. (ECF No. 41.) 28 1 2 In light of counsel’s response, the Court declines to impose sanctions on counsel for Defendants Lozovoy and Relevante. 3 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 18, 2017 /s/ 6 Michael J. Seng UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?