Asberry v. Biter
Filing
65
ORDER DENYING 58 59 Request for Entry of Default and Motion for Default Judgment as to Defendants Ferris and Godfrey signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 9/12/2017. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
TONY ASBERRY,
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 1:16-cv-01741-DAD-MJS (PC)
ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR ENTRY
OF DEFAULT AND MOTION FOR DEFAULT
JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANTS FERRIS
AND GODFREY
C. RELEVANTE, et al.,
Defendants.
(ECF NOS. 58, 59)
16
17
18
19
20
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil
21
rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The action proceeds on the following
22
claims: an Eighth Amendment claim for deliberate indifference to a serious medical need
23
against defendants Lozovoy and Relevante, an Eighth Amendment conditions of
24
confinement claim against defendants Ferris and Godfrey, and a First Amendment
25
retaliation claim against defendants Ferris and Godfrey.
26
On August 17, 2017, Defendants Ferris and Godfrey timely answered the
27
complaint. (ECF Nos. 35, 49.) On August 24, and August 25, 2017, respectively, Plaintiff
28
1
moved for entry of default and for default judgment as to these Defendants. (ECF Nos.
2
58, 59.)
3
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a) requires the Clerk of Court to enter default
4
against a party when that party has “failed to plead or otherwise defend, and that failure
5
is shown by affidavit or otherwise.” Once default has been entered, the Plaintiff may
6
move for the entry of default judgment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)(2). Here, Defendants Ferris
7
and Godfrey timely responded to Plaintiff’s complaint, and there is no basis for entering
8
default against them.
9
10
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s request for entry of default and motion for default judgment
are HEREBY DENIED.
11
12
13
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
September 12, 2017
/s/
14
Michael J. Seng
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?