Ali v. Hudson Insurance Company, et al.

Filing 6

ORDER ADOPTING 4 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL; ORDER DENYING 2 Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed IFP; and ORDER Directing Plaintiff to Pay the Filing Fee Within Thirty (30) Days signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/5/2017. (Jessen, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15
16

No. 1:16-cv-01743-DAD-EPG

HUSSEIN ALI,
Plaintiff,

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS

v.
HUDSON INSURANCE COMPANY, et
al.,

(Doc. Nos. 2 and 4)

Defendants.

17
18

On November 17, 2016, plaintiff Hussein Ali initiated this action by filing a civil

19

complaint, as well as a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. Nos. 1 and 2.) On December

20

12, 2016, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that

21

plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis be denied based upon the determination that

22

plaintiff’s complaint in this action was “not filed in good faith and has been filed to delay

23

proceedings and harass the Defendants.” (Doc. No. 4 at 3.) The findings and recommendations

24

were served on plaintiff with instructions that any objections thereto were be filed within fourteen

25

days of service of the findings and recommendations. To date, no objections have been filed.

26

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this court has conducted a

27

de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds that the

28

findings and recommendations are supported by the record and proper analysis.
1

1

Accordingly,

2

1) The findings and recommendations dated December 12, 2016 (Doc. No. 4) are

3

adopted in full;

4

2) The motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by the plaintiff on November 17,

5

2016 (Doc. No. 2) is denied;

6

3) Plaintiff shall pay the filing fee of $400 within thirty (30) days of the entry of this

7

order in order to proceed with this action; and

8

4) Any failure on plaintiff’s part to comply with this order by paying the required

9
10
11

filing fee will result in the dismissal of this action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

January 5, 2017
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2