Michael Jacobsen v. Pool
Filing
10
ORDER Granting Request for Status of Case signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 07/13/2017. (Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MICHAEL JACOBSEN,
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
Case No. 1:16-cv-01760-BAM (PC)
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR
STATUS OF CASE
v.
(ECF No. 9)
KIRK POOL,
Defendant.
16
17
Plaintiff Michael Jacobsen (“Plaintiff”), an inmate currently detained at the Fresno County
18
Jail, is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
19
§ 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s notice of change of address and request for status
20
of case. (ECF No. 9.) Plaintiff states that he is now incarcerated and does not know which of his
21
cases have deadlines. Plaintiff requests that the Court send him any deadlines in his pending
22
actions, as he is in custody and without any legal work.
23
The Court reminds Plaintiff that a screening order was issued in this action on June 13,
24
2017, and served by mail on Plaintiff. (ECF No. 8.) That order dismissed Plaintiff’s complaint
25
with leave to amend, for failure to state a cognizable claim for relief, and set forth the applicable
26
legal standards for curing deficiencies in the complaint. The order set a deadline of July 17, 2017
27
for the filing of Plaintiff’s first amended complaint or notice of voluntary dismissal, and warned
28
Plaintiff that failure to comply with the order would result in dismissal of this action, with
1
1
prejudice, for failure to state a claim and to obey a court order. (Id.)
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s request for status of case (ECF No. 9) is GRANTED, as set forth
2
3
above.
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Barbara
July 13, 2017
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?