Michael Jacobsen v. Pool

Filing 13

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE why this Action Should not be Dismissed, with Prejudice, for Failure to State a Claim, Failure to Obey a Court Order, and Failure to Prosecute re 8 , signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 7/24/17. Show Cause Response Due Within Twenty Days. (Gonzalez, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

MICHAEL JACOBSEN,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

v.
KIRK POOL,

15

Case No. 1:16-cv-01760-BAM (PC)
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS
ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED,
WITH PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO
STATE A CLAIM, FAILURE TO OBEY A
COURT ORDER, AND FAILURE TO
PROSECUTE

Defendant.
(ECF No. 8)

16

TWENTY (20) DAY DEADLINE

17

Plaintiff Michael Jacobsen (“Plaintiff”) is a former pretrial detainee proceeding pro se and

18
19

in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff initiated this

20

action on November 21, 2016. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff has consented to magistrate judge

21

jurisdiction. (ECF No. 4.)

22

On June 13, 2017, the Court issued an order dismissing Plaintiff’s complaint with leave to

23

amend within thirty (30) days. (ECF No. 8.) The Court expressly warned Plaintiff that the failure

24

to file an amended complaint in compliance with the Court’s order would result in this action

25

being dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to obey a court order and failure to state a claim. (Id.

26

at 5.) The deadline for Plaintiff to file an amended complaint has passed, and he has not

27

complied with the Court’s order.

28

///
1

1

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall show cause in writing, within

2

twenty (20) days of service of this order, why this action should not be dismissed, with prejudice,

3

for failure to comply with the Court’s June 13, 2017 order, failure to state a claim, and failure to

4

prosecute. Plaintiff can comply with this order to show cause by filing an amended complaint.

5

The failure to comply with this order will result in the dismissal of this action, with

6

prejudice, for failure to state a claim, failure to obey a court order, and failure to prosecute.

7
8
9

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Barbara

July 24, 2017

A. McAuliffe

_

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2