Oushana, et al. v. Lowe's Companies, Inc. et al.
Filing
52
ORDER Entering Stipulated Dismissal With Prejudice Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 3/14/2018. CASE CLOSED. (Jessen, A)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
8
NORA OUSHANA, an individual; and
SCARLET KARAMIAN, an individual,
9
10
11
12
13
CASE NO. 1:16-cv-01782-AWI-SAB
ORDER ENTERING STIPULATED
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
PURSUANT TO Fed. R. Civ. P.
41(a)(1)(A)(ii)
Plaintiffs,
v.
LOWE’S COMPANIES, INC.,, a North
Carolina corporation; LOWE’S HIW, INC.,
a California corporation; ELECTROLUX
NORTH AMERICA, INC., a North Carolina
corporation
14
Defendants.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Plaintiffs Nora Oushana and Scarlet Karamian brought this product liability action in
Stanislaus County Superior Court on August 10, 2016. Defendants Lowe’s Companies, Inc., and
Electrolux North America, Inc., removed this action to this Court on November 23, 2016. After
several rounds of motions to dismiss the parties informally resolved the matter and have
stipulated to dismissal of this action with prejudice. The parties agree to each bear their own
costs, expenses, and fees. According to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and
(a)(1)(B), such notice operates as a dismissal with prejudice.
The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
Dated: March 14, 2018
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE
27
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?