Kerr v. Delaware North Companies, Inc. et al
Filing
18
SECOND STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS; ORDER signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on February 3, 2017. (Munoz, I)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
ERIC J. RATINOFF, SBN 166204
eric@ericratinoff.com
MADISON M. SIMMONS, SBN 292185
msimmons@ericratinoff.com
ERIC RATINOFF LAW CORP.
401 Watt Avenue
Sacramento, California 95864
Telephone: (916) 970-9100
Facsimile: (916) 246-1696
RUSSELL G. PETTI, State Bar No. 137160
THE LAW OFFICES OF RUSSELL G. PETTI
466 Foothill Blvd., # 389
La Canada, California 91011
818 952-2168Telephone
818 952-2186 Facsimile
Email: Rpetti@petti-legal.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Jennifer Kerr
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
JENNIFER KERR,
Plaintiff,
15
16
17
18
19
20
v.
DELAWARE NORTH COMPANIES,
INC.; DNC PARKS AND RESORTS AT
YOSEMITE, INC.; DELAWARE NORTH
COMPANIES PARKS AND RESORTS,
INC.; KATHY STEVENSON, KARL
VONDERLUFT, NICKIE RAY JENSON,
JESSIE MERRILL, and DOES 1 through
75, inclusive,
21
CASE NO. 1:16-CV-01797-LJO-SAB
SECOND STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS;
ORDER
Complaint Filed May 20, 2016
FAC Filed: October 25, 2016
Removed on: November 28, 2016
Defendants,
22
23
24
Plaintiff Jennifer Kerr (“Ms. Kerr”) and Defendants Delaware North Companies, Inc.,
DNC Parks and Resorts at Yosemite, Inc., and Delaware North Companies Parks and Resorts,
25
Inc. (“Defendants”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate to the
26
following:
27
28
1.
Defendants have filed a Motion to Dismiss, which was originally set to be heard
on January 19, 2017;
SECOND STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE; ORDER
1
2.
Ms. Kerr disputed that Defendants’ removal of this action to federal court was
2
proper, and in order to resolve this jurisdictional issue prior to litigating the substance of this
3
matter, the parties agreed to seek to continue the hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss;
4
3.
To that end, the Parties filed a stipulation asking that the hearing on the Motion to
5
Dismiss be continued from January 19, 2017 to February 27, 2017, which was granted by the
6
Court;
7
8
9
10
11
12
4.
Ms. Kerr has since filed a motion to remand, which Defendants opposed. That
issue is currently submitted to the Court for its determination;
5.
In order to avoid having to litigate the issue of Defendants’ motion to dismiss
before this Court decides Ms. Kerr’s remand motion, the Parties respectfully request a further
continuance of the hearing on Defendants’ motion to dismiss, to March 20, 2017 at 8:30 a.m., or
the first date after that on which the Court is available.
13
Date: February 2, 2017
14
It is so stipulated.
Date: February 2, 2017
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
Joshua A. Rodine
Bethany A. Vasquez
15
16
17
18
19
By: S/Bethany A. Vasquez
Counsel for Defendants Delaware North
Companies, Inc., DNC Parks & Resorts at
Yosemite, Inc., and Delaware North
Companies Parks and Resorts, Inc.
22
23
24
25
26
27
LAW OFFICES OF RUSSELL G. PETTI
Russell G. Petti
By: S/Russell G. Petti
Counsel for Plaintiff Jennifer Kerr
ORDER
20
21
ERIC RATINOFF LAW CORP.
Eric J. Ratinoff
Madison M. Simmons
BASED ON THE STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES and for Good Cause shown, the
hearing date on Defendants Delaware North Companies, Inc., DNC Parks and Resorts at
Yosemite, Inc., and Delaware North Companies Parks and Resorts, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss,
currently set for hearing on February 27, 2017 is continued until March 20, 2017 at 8:30 a.m.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
February 3, 2017
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____
UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE
28
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE; ORDER
1:16-cv-01797-LJO-SAB
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?