Trujillo v. Old Navy, LLC et al

Filing 10

STIPULATION and ORDER to Continue Defendant's Responsive Pleading Deadlines to 2/22/2017, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 1/23/2017. (Lafata, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683
Zachary M. Best, SBN 166035
MISSION LAW FIRM, A.P.C.
332 North Second Street
San Jose, California 95112
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
JOSE TRUJILLO
BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP
Ryan D. Fischbach, SBN 204406
[e-mail]
11601 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 1400
Los Angeles, CA 90025-0509
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
IREIT Fresno El Paseo, L.L.C.
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
Kathy H. Gao, SBN 259019
[e-mail]
300 South Grand Avenue
Twenty-Second Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071-3132
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
OLD NAVY, LLC

19
20

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

21

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

22

JOSE TRUJILLO,

23

Plaintiff,

24
25
26

Case No. 1:16-cv-01801-DAD-MJS

vs.

JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSIVE
PLEADING DEADLINES

OLD NAVY, LLC dba OLD NAVY #6371;
IREIT FRESNO EL PASEO, L.L.C.;
Defendants.

27
28
MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
LOS ANGELES

DB1/ 90415951.1

JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSIVE PLEADING
DEADLINES
1:16-CV-01801-DAD-MJS

1
2

WHEREAS, Plaintiff Jose Trujillo (“Plaintiff”) filed his Complaint on November 29,
2016;

3
4

WHEREAS, Plaintiff served his Complaint on Defendant Old Navy, LLC (“Old Navy”)
December 7, 2016;

5
6
7

WHEREAS, Plaintiff served his Complaint on Defendant IREIT Fresno El Paseo, L.L.C.
(“IREIT”) (Plaintiff, Old Navy, and IREIT collectively referred to as the “Parties”) on December
7, 2016;

8
9

WHEREAS, through the Parties’ prior stipulations [Dkt. Nos. 6-7], Defendants Old
Navy’s and IREIT’s current responsive pleading deadline is January 25, 2017;

10

WHEREAS, the Parties are currently negotiating the terms of the resolution;

11
12
13
14

WHEREAS, the Parties’ respective counsel have met and conferred and agree that in the
interest of conserving the Parties’ and the court’s resources, Defendants Old Navy’s and IREIT’s
respective responsive pleading deadlines should be further continued to February 22, 2017 to
allow the Parties to continue negotiating the terms of the resolution.

15
16

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and through the
Parties’ respective counsel as follows:

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

Defendants Old Navy’s and IREIT’s respective deadlines to file a responsive pleading to
Plaintiff’s Complaint shall be extended by four weeks to February 22, 2017.
///
///
///
///
///
///
///
///

27
28
MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP

1

ATTORNEYS AT LAW
LOS ANGELES

DB1/ 90415951.1

JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSIVE PLEADING
DEADLINES
1:16-CV-01801-DAD-MJS

1

Dated: January 23, 2017

MISSION LAW FIRM, A.P.C.

2
By

3

/s/ Zachary M. Best
ZACHARY M. BEST
Attorney for Plaintiff
JOSE TRUJILLO

4
5

Dated: January 23, 2017

6

BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP
By

/s/ Ryan D. Fischbach
RYAN D. FISCHBACH
Attorney for Defendant
IREIT FRESNO EL PASEO, L.L.C.

7
8
9

Dated: January 23, 2017

10

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
By

/s/ Kathy H. Gao
KATHY H. GAO
Attorney for Defendant
OLD NAVY, LLC

11
12
13

ORDER

14
15

After considering the Parties’ stipulation and good cause appearing, IT IS

16

HEREBY ORDERED that the deadline for Defendants Old Navy and IREIT to file a

17

responsive pleading to Plaintiff’s Complaint in case number 1:16-cv-01801-DAD-MJS.is

18

extended to February 22, 2017.

19
20
21

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

January 23, 2017

/s/

Michael J. Seng

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP

2

ATTORNEYS AT LAW
LOS ANGELES

DB1/ 90415951.1

JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSIVE PLEADING
DEADLINES
1:16-CV-01801-DAD-MJS