Gonzales v. Ferrso, et al.
Filing
62
ORDER Directing the Clerk of Court to Send Plaintiff a Copy of the Instant Motion and his Opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 07/12/2018. (Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
MICHAEL GONZALES,
Case No. 1:16-cv-01813-DAD-EPG (PC)
Plaintiff,
10
11
v.
12
ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF
COURT TO SEND PLAINTIFF A COPY
OF THE INSTANT MOTION AND HIS
OPPOSITION TO THE MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
FERRSO, et al.,
13
Defendants.
(ECF No. 60)
14
15
Michael Gonzales (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma
16 pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 2, 2018, Plaintiff filed
17 a motion, (ECF No. 60), for a copy of the instant motion and exhibits “A” through “H” of his
18 opposition, (ECF No. 61), to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, including the affidavit
19 of an inmate. Plaintiff states that correctional officers at Kern Valley State Prison refused to
20 sign his request for copies of the documents, which were to be served on Defendants.
21
In light of Plaintiff’s difficulty in copying the documents, the Court will provide
22 Plaintiff a courtesy copy and waive his obligation to separately serve Defendants with the
23 documents. As Plaintiff has filed the documents with the Court, Defendants have received a
24 copy of the document via CM/ECF, which will constitute service.
25 \\\
26 \\\
27 \\\
28 \\\
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. Plaintiff’s motion for copies, (ECF No. 60), is granted; and
3
2. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail Plaintiff a copy of the instant motion, (ECF
No. 60), and the opposition to the motion for summary judgment, (ECF No. 61).
4
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
July 12, 2018
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?