Gonzales v. Ferrso, et al.

Filing 62

ORDER Directing the Clerk of Court to Send Plaintiff a Copy of the Instant Motion and his Opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 07/12/2018. (Flores, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 MICHAEL GONZALES, Case No. 1:16-cv-01813-DAD-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, 10 11 v. 12 ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO SEND PLAINTIFF A COPY OF THE INSTANT MOTION AND HIS OPPOSITION TO THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FERRSO, et al., 13 Defendants. (ECF No. 60) 14 15 Michael Gonzales (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 16 pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 2, 2018, Plaintiff filed 17 a motion, (ECF No. 60), for a copy of the instant motion and exhibits “A” through “H” of his 18 opposition, (ECF No. 61), to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, including the affidavit 19 of an inmate. Plaintiff states that correctional officers at Kern Valley State Prison refused to 20 sign his request for copies of the documents, which were to be served on Defendants. 21 In light of Plaintiff’s difficulty in copying the documents, the Court will provide 22 Plaintiff a courtesy copy and waive his obligation to separately serve Defendants with the 23 documents. As Plaintiff has filed the documents with the Court, Defendants have received a 24 copy of the document via CM/ECF, which will constitute service. 25 \\\ 26 \\\ 27 \\\ 28 \\\ 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. Plaintiff’s motion for copies, (ECF No. 60), is granted; and 3 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail Plaintiff a copy of the instant motion, (ECF No. 60), and the opposition to the motion for summary judgment, (ECF No. 61). 4 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 12, 2018 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?