Stevenson v. Holland, et al.

Filing 63

ORDER AFTER IN CAMERA REVIEW, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 6/12/2019. (Hall, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DOUGLAS J. STEVENSON,

12

Case No. 1:16-cv-01831-AWI-JLT
Plaintiff, ORDER AFTER IN CAMERA REVIEW

13

v.

(Doc. 57)

14
K. HOLLAND, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
At the request of counsel, the Court has conducted an in camera review of documents

17
18

produced to the Court, which are responsive to production requests. The Court will order

19

production of some of the records. In doing so, the Court makes no comment as to the

20

admissibility of these documents nor does it make any finding that the privileges asserted may not

21

be asserted at trial.

22

The Court ORDERS the defendants to disclose the following redacted1 documents:

23

1.

24
25
26

Documents with Bates numbers 250-287, 327-338, 386-423, 427-428, 442, 444,

455
Despite its earlier order, the Court DECLINES to maintain the records that it has not
ordered to be disclosed. Rather, the defense SHALL maintain them and produce them, if ordered,

27
1

28

Redaction should occur to obliterate the personal identifiers of witnesses and complainants as well as the
identifiers of other involved correctional staff.

1

for purposes of appeal.

2
3
4

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

June 12, 2019

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28