Stevenson v. Holland, et al.

Filing 69

ORDER AFTER INFORMAL TELEPHONIC CONFERENCE, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 8/27/2019. (Hall, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DOUGLAS J. STEVENSON,

12

Plaintiff,

13

Case No. 1:16-cv-01831-AWI-JLT
ORDER AFTER INFORMAL
TELEPHONIC CONFERENCE

v.
(Doc. 66)

14

K. HOLLAND, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

The Court held an informal telephone conference regarding discovery disputes1. (Doc. 66)

18

Before the conference, defense counsel agreed to produce the full evidence log for the videotape

19

of the interview of plaintiff taken on December 7, 2012. There was no agreement as to any other

20

issue. Thus, the Court authorized plaintiff to file his motion to compel.

21
22

The motion to compel SHALL comply with Local Rule 251(c). Failure to do so will result
in the Court dropping the matter from calendar.

23
24
25

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

August 27, 2019

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

26
27
28

1

As an aside, the Court notes that the dispute regarding the bulk of these items has existed since November
2018. Thus, if the plaintiff decides to pursue a motion to compel, he SHALL discuss the timeliness of the motion.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28