Wilkes v. Umpqua Bank

Filing 14

ORDER DIRECTING the Clerk of the Court to Close Case; Voluntarily Dismissed, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 07/06/17.CASE CLOSED (Martin-Gill, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

NICOLE WILKES,

12
13
14

Plaintiff

Case No. 1:16-cv-01846-LJO-EPG
ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF
THE COURT TO CLOSE CASE

v.
(ECF No. 13)
UMPQUA BANK,

15

Defendant.

16
17

On July 3, 2017, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss this action with prejudice. (ECF

18

No. 13.) Both parties have agreed to the dismissal. In light of the stipulation, the case has ended,

19

see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997),

20

and is dismissed with prejudice. Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493, 1506 (9th Cir. 1995) (“Even if

21

the defendant has filed a motion to dismiss, the plaintiff may terminate his action voluntarily by

22

filing a notice of dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1).”). Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is

23

DIRECTED to close this case.

24
25
26

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

July 6, 2017

/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

27
28
1

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2