Favor v. Minaj

Filing 2

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 12/15/2016. CASE TRANSFERRED to the Central District of California. CASE CLOSED. (Lundstrom, T)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

BRANDON FAVOR,

12

1:16-cv-01851-JLT (HC)

Petitioner,

13
14

ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

v.
NIKKI MINAJ,

15

Respondent.

16
17
18

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a habeas corpus action pursuant to
28 U.S.C. ' 2254.

19

The federal venue statute requires that a civil action, other than one based on diversity

20

jurisdiction, be brought only in A(1) a judicial district where any defendant resides, if all

21

defendants reside in the same state, (2) a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events

22

or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part of the property that is the

23

subject of the action is situated, or (3) a judicial district in which any defendant may be found, if

24

there is no district in which the action may otherwise be brought.@ 28 U.S.C. ' 1391(b).

25

In this case, the petitioner is challenging a conviction from Los Angeles County, which is

26

in the Central District of California. Therefore, the petition should have been filed in the United

27

States District Court for the Central District of California. In the interest of justice, a federal

28

court may transfer a case filed in the wrong district to the correct district. See 28 U.S.C. '
1

1
2
3

1406(a); Starnes v. McGuire, 512 F.2d 918, 932 (D.C. Cir. 1974).
Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that this matter is transferred to the United States
District Court for the Central District of California.

4
5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

December 15, 2016

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2