Bontemps v. Hicks
Filing
21
ORDER ADOPTING 20 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONSto Deny Plaintiff's Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis; ORDER to Pay in full the $400.00 Filing Fee for this action, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/22/18. (Case Management Deadline:30-Day Deadline)(Martin-Gill, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
GREGORY C. BONTEMPS,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 1:16-cv-01854-DAD-EPG (PC)
v.
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS TO DENY
PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST TO PROCEED IN
FORMA PAUPERIS
D. HICKS,
15
Defendants.
(Doc. No. 20)
16
17
Plaintiff, Gregory C. Bontemps, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights
18
19
action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge
20
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On April 25, 2018, the assigned magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations,
21
22
recommending that plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis in this action be denied
23
because he had suffered at least three prior strike dismissals and did not qualify under 28 U.S.C. §
24
1915(g)’s imminent danger exception. (Doc. No. 20.) The findings and recommendations were
25
served on plaintiff and contained notice that objections thereto were due within twenty-one days.
26
(Id. at 9.) To date, plaintiff has not filed objections, and the time in which to do so has now
27
passed.
28
/////
1
1
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this court has conducted a
2
de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings
3
and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
4
Accordingly:
5
1. The April 23, 2018 findings and recommendations (Doc. No. 20) are adopted in full;
6
2. Within thirty days from the date of service of this order, plaintiff is required to pay in
7
8
full the $400.00 filing fee for this action; and
3. Plaintiff’s failure to pay the required filing fee as ordered will result in the dismissal of
9
this action.
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
Dated:
October 22, 2018
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?