Zaiza v. Guthrie, et al.
Filing
43
ORDER vacating Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum 33 signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 10/9/2018. CASE CLOSED.(Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JOSE ROBERTO ZAIZA,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
CASE No. 1:16-cv-01862-LJO-JLT (PC)
ORDER VACATING WRIT OF HABEAS
CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM
v.
(Doc. 33)
C. GUTHRIE, et al.,
CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE
15
Defendants.
16
17
The parties settled this action on September 5, 2018, during a settlement. (Doc. 40.) All dates,
18
hearings, and conferences have been vacated, and the parties have now filed a stipulation for voluntary
19
dismissal with prejudice. (Doc. 42.) The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 makes such
20
stipulations effective immediately with further order of the Court. Because all parties who have appeared
21
in the action signed the stipulation (Doc. 42), it “automatically terminate[d] the action.” Wilson v. City
22
of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, The Court thus ORDERS:
1. The September 11, 2018, writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum for plaintiff’s appearance
23
24
at the telephonic trial confirmation hearing (Doc. 33) is VACATED;
25
2. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action;
26
///
27
///
28
1
1
3. The Clerk of Court shall provide via fax or email a copy of this order to the Litigation
2
Coordinator at California State Prison in Corcoran, California.
3
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
October 9, 2018
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?