Gonzalez v. Davey
Filing
8
ORDER DISCHARGING Order to Show Cause and Requiring Petitioner to File Status Reports signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 7/20/2017. First Status Report due within thirty (30) days. (Jessen, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
IGNACIO GONZALEZ,
10
11
12
13
Petitioner,
Case No. 1:16-cv-01871-SKO HC
ORDER DISCHARGING
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
v.
DAVID DAVEY, Warden,
(Doc. 6)
Respondent.
14
15
Petitioner Ignacio Gonzalez is a state prisoner proceeding with a petition for writ of habeas
16
17
corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On January 27, 2017, the Court granted Petitioner’s motion
18
for stay and abeyance to allow him to exhaust his state remedies. The order directed Petitioner to
19
file an initial status report within thirty (30) days and to file status reports every ninety days
20
thereafter. Although Petitioner filed a timely initial status report, he failed to file the report due
21
ninety days later. On June 12, 2017, this Court ordered Petitioner to show cause within fifteen days
22
why he should not be sanctioned for failure to file a status report on the pending state proceedings.
23
24
25
On June 29, 2017, Pastor Rick Riley of Thief on the Cross Prison Ministry filed notice with
the Clerk of Court that Petitioner had been unable to file the status report because Petitioner’s legal
26
property had been sequestered in the course of transferring Petitioner to another prison. Pastor
27
Riley explained that he had been assisting Petitioner, who is illiterate, in preparing the documents
28
1
1
necessary to prosecute his petition on his own behalf. Pastor Riley appended to his notice available
2
documentation of the ongoing state procedures and explained that certain documentation had not
3
yet been received from the clerk of the state court.
4
Although Pastor Riley may assist Petitioner in preparing documents for filing over
5
Petitioner’s signature, because he is not an attorney, Pastor Riley may not act on behalf of
6
Petitioner or any other party proceeding pro se. The privilege to proceed pro se is personal to the
7
litigant and does not extend to other parties or entities acting on his behalf. See Simon v. Hartford
8
9
Life, Inc., 546 F.3d 661, 664 (9th Cir. 2008). “[A] non-attorney may appear only in her own
10
behalf.” Cato v. United States, 70 F.3d 1103, 1105 n. 1 (9th Cir. 1995). Although a person who is
11
not an attorney may appear pro se on his own behalf (28 U.S.C. § 1654), “he has no authority to
12
appear as an attorney for others than himself.” McShane v. United States, 366 F.2d 286, 288 ( 9th
13
14
Cir. 1966).
Nonetheless, the Court takes notice of the documents evincing Petitioner’s good faith
15
16
17
pursuit of the state remedies. The Court will permit Petitioner to file a status report over his own
signature within thirty (30) days of this order and directs Petitioner to file subsequent reports every
18
ninety (90) days thereafter. If Petitioner does not receive state legal documentation in time to
19
append it to any status report, he may simply declare under penalty of perjury what state
20
proceedings are then ongoing. If Pastor Riley or any other individual who is not an attorney assists
21
Petitioner by preparing the report using information provided by petitioner, the document may
22
disclose that fact and reflect that Petitioner has signed the document after it has been read aloud to
23
24
25
him. However, Petitioner himself must sign the status report and declaration under penalty of
perjury.
26
Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS that the order to show cause issued June 12, 2017
27
(Doc. 6), be discharged. Within thirty (30) days of this order and every ninety days (90) thereafter
28
2
1
2
until the California Supreme Court has issued its ruling in the state proceedings, Petitioner shall
report the current status of the pending state action.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
Dated:
6
July 20, 2017
/s/
Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?