Baker v. German, et al.
Filing
23
ORDER ADOPTING 19 Findings and Recommendations, Dismissing False Imprisonment Claim, and Referring Matter Back to Magistrate Judge for Initiation of Service of Process, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 6/8/17. (Marrujo, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DOMINIQUE D. BAKER,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
HUMBERTO GERMAN, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Case No.: 1:16-cv-01873-AWI-SAB (PC)
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING FALSE
IMPRISONMENT CLAIM, AND REFERRING
MATTER BACK TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR
INITIATION OF SERVICE OF PROCESS
[ECF Nos. 18, 19, 20]
Plaintiff Dominique Baker is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action
17
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
19
20
636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On May 1, 2017, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and
21
Recommendations recommending that the action proceed on Plaintiff’s excessive force claim against
22
Defendants Humberto German and Phillip Holguin and the false imprisonment claim be dismissed for
23
failure to state a cognizable claim for relief. The Findings and Recommendations were served on
24
Plaintiff and contained notice that objections were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff filed
25
objections on May 15, 2017.
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
1
2
3
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de
4
novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Plaintiff’s objections,
5
the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper
6
analysis.
7
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
8
1.
The Findings and Recommendations, filed on May 1, 2017, are adopted in full;
9
2.
This action shall proceed on Plaintiff’s excessive force claim against Defendants
10
11
12
13
Humberto German and Phillip Holguin;
3.
Plaintiff’s false imprisonment claim is dismissed for failure to state a cognizable claim
for relief; and
4.
The matter is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for initiation of service of process.
14
15
IT IS SO ORDERED.
16
Dated: June 8, 2017
17
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?