Blackman v. Paramo et al

Filing 3

ORDER Transferring Case to the Southern District of California signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 12/28/2016. CASE CLOSED. (Flores, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 1:16-cv-01875-GSA (PC) TONY BLACKMAN, Plaintiff, ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA v. DANIEL PARAMO, et al, 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 19 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983. The federal venue statute requires that a civil action, other than one based on diversity 20 jurisdiction, be brought only in A(1) a judicial district where any defendant resides, if all 21 defendants reside in the same state, (2) a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events 22 or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part of the property that is the 23 subject of the action is situated, or (3) a judicial district in which any defendant may be found, if 24 there is no district in which the action may otherwise be brought.@ 28 U.S.C. ' 1391(b). 25 In this case, the claim arose from events occurring in San Diego County, which is in the 26 Southern District of California. Therefore, plaintiff=s claim should have been filed in the United 27 States District Court for the Southern District of California. In the interest of justice, a federal 28 1 1 court may transfer a complaint filed in the wrong district to the correct district. See 28 U.S.C. ' 2 1406(a); Starnes v. McGuire, 512 F.2d 918, 932 (D.C. Cir. 1974). 3 4 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is transferred to the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 28, 2016 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?