Perkins v. Nestle Dreyer's Ice Cream Company
Filing
18
STIPULATION and ORDER ADVANCING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE. The Settlement Conference currently set for 11/21/2017, is ADVANCED to 10/24/2017, at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. The parties shall submit their confidential settlement conference statements by no later than 10/17/2017. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 9/19/2017. (Timken, A)
1
2
3
4
5
SEBASTIAN L. MILLER (SBN 265793)
sebastian@sebastianmillerlaw.com
SEBASTIAN MILLER LAW, P.C.
900 Lafayette Street, Suite 201
Santa Clara, CA 95050
Telephone: (408) 348-1728
Facsimile: (408) 716-3149
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Andrew Perkins
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
EMMA LUEVANO (SBN 198421)
eyl@msk.com
JUSTINE LAZARUS (SBN 247471)
jwl@msk.com
MITCHELL SILBERBERG & KNUPP LLP
11377 West Olympic Boulevard
Los Angeles, CA 90064-1683
Telephone: (310) 312-2000
Facsimile: (310) 312-3100
Attorneys for Defendant
Nestlé Dreyer’s Ice Cream Company
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
FRESNO DIVISION
17
ANDREW PERKINS,
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Plaintiff,
v.
NESTLE DREYER'S ICE CREAM
COMPANY,
Defendant.
CASE NO. 1:16-cv-01877-LJO-SKO
STIPULATION AND ORDER
ADVANCING SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE BEFORE JUDGE
SHEILA K. OBERTO
(Doc. 17)
Judge Lawrence J. O’Neill /
Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto
Proposed Date For Settlement Conference:
Date: October 24, 2017
Time: 10:00 a.m.
Courtroom: 7
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER ADVANCING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
CASE NO. 1:16-CV-01877-LJO-SKO
Based on the good cause specified below and pursuant to Rule 143 of the Local Rules of
1
2
the Eastern District of California, Plaintiff Andrew Perkins (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Nestlé
3
Dreyer’s Ice Cream Company (“Defendant” and, together with Plaintiff, the “Parties”), through
4
their counsel, stipulate to advance the Parties’ settlement conference from November 21, 2017 to
5
October 24, 2017.
6
WHEREAS, counsel for the Parties conferred with Judge Sheila K. Oberto’s Courtroom
7
Deputy Alice Timken regarding a request to advance the settlement conference in this matter by
8
approximately one month;
WHEREAS, Ms. Timken informed the Parties that the Court is available to conduct a
9
10
settlement conference on October 24, 2017 and that if they wished to have the settlement
11
conference conducted on that date they should file a stipulation and proposed order advancing the
12
settlement conference accordingly;
WHEREAS, all Parties and their counsel are available on October 24, 2017 and believe it
13
14
is in the interests of justice that the settlement conference occur on that date.
15
16
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS.
The Settlement Conference that is currently scheduled for November 21, 2017 at 10:00
17
18
a.m. in Courtroom 7 is hereby advanced and is now set for October 24, 2017 at 10:00 a.m. in
19
Courtroom 7.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND ORDER ADVANCING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
CASE NO. 1:16-CV-01877-LJO-SKO
9259261.2
1
2
IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.
3
4
DATED: September 18, 2017
5
Respectfully submitted,
Sebastian L. Miller
SEBASTIAN MILLER LAW, P.C.
6
7
By: /s/ Sebastian L. Miller
Sebastian L. Miller
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Andrew Perkins
8
9
10
11
DATED: September 18, 2017
Respectfully submitted,
Emma Luevano
Justine Lazarus
MITCHELL SILBERBERG & KNUPP LLP
12
13
14
By: [as authorized on September 18, 2017]
Emma Luevano
Justine Lazarus
Attorneys for Defendant
Nestlé Dreyer’s Ice Cream Company
15
16
17
ORDER
18
Pursuant to the parties’ above-stipulation (Doc. 17), the Settlement Conference currently
19
20
scheduled for November 21, 2017, is hereby ADVANCED to October 24, 2017 at 10:00 a.m. in
21
Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto.
22
23
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
September 19, 2017
/s/
Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND ORDER ADVANCING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
CASE NO. 1:16-CV-01877-LJO-SKO
.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?