Perkins v. Nestle Dreyer's Ice Cream Company

Filing 18

STIPULATION and ORDER ADVANCING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE. The Settlement Conference currently set for 11/21/2017, is ADVANCED to 10/24/2017, at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. The parties shall submit their confidential settlement conference statements by no later than 10/17/2017. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 9/19/2017. (Timken, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 SEBASTIAN L. MILLER (SBN 265793) sebastian@sebastianmillerlaw.com SEBASTIAN MILLER LAW, P.C. 900 Lafayette Street, Suite 201 Santa Clara, CA 95050 Telephone: (408) 348-1728 Facsimile: (408) 716-3149 Attorneys for Plaintiff Andrew Perkins 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 EMMA LUEVANO (SBN 198421) eyl@msk.com JUSTINE LAZARUS (SBN 247471) jwl@msk.com MITCHELL SILBERBERG & KNUPP LLP 11377 West Olympic Boulevard Los Angeles, CA 90064-1683 Telephone: (310) 312-2000 Facsimile: (310) 312-3100 Attorneys for Defendant Nestlé Dreyer’s Ice Cream Company 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 FRESNO DIVISION 17 ANDREW PERKINS, 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Plaintiff, v. NESTLE DREYER'S ICE CREAM COMPANY, Defendant. CASE NO. 1:16-cv-01877-LJO-SKO STIPULATION AND ORDER ADVANCING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE BEFORE JUDGE SHEILA K. OBERTO (Doc. 17) Judge Lawrence J. O’Neill / Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto Proposed Date For Settlement Conference: Date: October 24, 2017 Time: 10:00 a.m. Courtroom: 7 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER ADVANCING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE CASE NO. 1:16-CV-01877-LJO-SKO Based on the good cause specified below and pursuant to Rule 143 of the Local Rules of 1 2 the Eastern District of California, Plaintiff Andrew Perkins (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Nestlé 3 Dreyer’s Ice Cream Company (“Defendant” and, together with Plaintiff, the “Parties”), through 4 their counsel, stipulate to advance the Parties’ settlement conference from November 21, 2017 to 5 October 24, 2017. 6 WHEREAS, counsel for the Parties conferred with Judge Sheila K. Oberto’s Courtroom 7 Deputy Alice Timken regarding a request to advance the settlement conference in this matter by 8 approximately one month; WHEREAS, Ms. Timken informed the Parties that the Court is available to conduct a 9 10 settlement conference on October 24, 2017 and that if they wished to have the settlement 11 conference conducted on that date they should file a stipulation and proposed order advancing the 12 settlement conference accordingly; WHEREAS, all Parties and their counsel are available on October 24, 2017 and believe it 13 14 is in the interests of justice that the settlement conference occur on that date. 15 16 NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS. The Settlement Conference that is currently scheduled for November 21, 2017 at 10:00 17 18 a.m. in Courtroom 7 is hereby advanced and is now set for October 24, 2017 at 10:00 a.m. in 19 Courtroom 7. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION AND ORDER ADVANCING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE CASE NO. 1:16-CV-01877-LJO-SKO 9259261.2 1 2 IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. 3 4 DATED: September 18, 2017 5 Respectfully submitted, Sebastian L. Miller SEBASTIAN MILLER LAW, P.C. 6 7 By: /s/ Sebastian L. Miller Sebastian L. Miller Attorneys for Plaintiff Andrew Perkins 8 9 10 11 DATED: September 18, 2017 Respectfully submitted, Emma Luevano Justine Lazarus MITCHELL SILBERBERG & KNUPP LLP 12 13 14 By: [as authorized on September 18, 2017] Emma Luevano Justine Lazarus Attorneys for Defendant Nestlé Dreyer’s Ice Cream Company 15 16 17 ORDER 18 Pursuant to the parties’ above-stipulation (Doc. 17), the Settlement Conference currently 19 20 scheduled for November 21, 2017, is hereby ADVANCED to October 24, 2017 at 10:00 a.m. in 21 Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. 22 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 19, 2017 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION AND ORDER ADVANCING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE CASE NO. 1:16-CV-01877-LJO-SKO .

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?