Perkins v. Nestle Dreyer's Ice Cream Company

Filing 26

ORDER GRANTING Stipulation of Dismissal and DIRECTING the Clerk of the Court to Close the Case, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 12/5/17. CASE CLOSED (Martin-Gill, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9

ANDREW PERKINS,

10

Plaintiff,

11
12

Case No. 1:16-cv-01877-LJO-SKO

v.
NESTLE DREYER’S ICE CREAM COMPANY,

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION OF
DISMISSAL (FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)) AND
DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE
COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE
(Doc. 25)

13

Defendant.

14
15
16

On December 4, 2017, the parties filed a joint Stipulation of Dismissal dismissing the action

17

with prejudice and with each party bearing its own attorney’s fees and costs. (Doc. 25.) In light of the

18

parties’ stipulation, this action has been terminated, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City

19

of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly,

20

the Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.

21
22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23
Dated:

December 5, 2017

24

/s/

Sheila K. Oberto

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

25
26
27

1
ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)
9533015.1/47538-00003

28

.