Jeff Walker v. Robles et al
Filing
11
ORDER DISMISSING Action Without Prejudice and Denying 6 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order as Moot; ORDER DIRECTING Case Closure by Court Clerk, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 9/18/17. CASE CLOSED. (Marrujo, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
Case No. 1:16-cv-01886-AWI-JLT (PC)
JEFF WALKER,
Plaintiff,
12
13
v.
14
ROBLES, et al.,
15
16
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT
PREJUDICE AND DENYING MOTION FOR
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AS MOOT
(Docs. 6, 9, 10)
Defendants.
ORDER DIRECTING CASE CLOSURE BY
COURT CLERK
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Plaintiff filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis along with this civil rights action
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On June 12, 2017, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations to deny
Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis based on his untrue poverty allegation. (Doc.
9.) The Findings and Recommendations were adopted on August 2, 2017, and Plaintiff was
ordered to pay the full filing fee within twenty-one days. (Doc. 10.) Plaintiff was warned that the
failure to timely pay the fee would result in the dismissal of this case. (Id.) Approximately a
month has lapsed and Plaintiff has not paid the filing fee. Therefore, pursuant to the Court’s
August 2, 2017 order and warning, this case will be dismissed and closed.
28
1
1
2
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1.
3
4
requisite $400 filing fee;
2.
5
6
This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to pay the
The pending motion for a temporary restraining order (Doc. 6) is DENIED as
moot; and
3.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to CLOSE this case.
7
8
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 18, 2017
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?