Gonzalez v. Corrections Corporation of America et al

Filing 58

STIPULATION and ORDER 57 to Continue the Filing Date of Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 5/10/2019. Motion to be filed by 7/15/2019. (Hall, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 PETER R. DION-KINDEM (SBN 95267) THE DION-KINDEM LAW FIRM PETER R. DION-KINDEM, P. C. 2945 Townsgate Road, Suite 200 Westlake Village, CA 91361 Telephone: (818) 883-4900 Fax: (818) 338-2533 Email: peter@dion-kindemlaw.com LONNIE C. BLANCHARD, III (SBN 93530) THE BLANCHARD LAW GROUP, APC 3579 East Foothill Blvd., No. 338 Pasadena, CA 91107 Telephone: (213) 599-8255 Fax: (213) 402-3949 Email: lonnieblanchard@gmail.com 11 Attorneys for Plaintiff Jose Gonzalez 12 [Additional attorneys listed on following page] 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 17 18 19 Jose Gonzalez, an individual, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, vs. 20 21 22 Case No. 1:16-cv-01891-DAD-JLT Stipulation to Continue the Filing Date of Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement from May 13, 2019 to June 14, 2019 and [Proposed] Order CoreCivic of Tennesee, LLC (formerly CCA of Tennessee, LLC), and Does 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants. 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation to Continue Filing Date of Motion for Preliminary Approval 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 Todd M. Friedman (SBN 216752) Adrian R. Bacon (SBN 280332) LAW OFFICES OF TODD M. FRIEDMAN 21550 Oxnard Street, Suite 780 Woodland Hills, California 91367 Telephone: (877) 206-4741 Facsimile: (866) 633-0228 tfriedman@toddflaw.com abacon@toddflaw.com 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff Thomas Richards 8 PAUL M. GLEASON State Bar No.: 155569 TOREY FAVAROTE State Bar No.: 198521 4014 Long Beach Blvd., Suite 300 Long Beach, California 90807 Telephone: (562) 548-6700 Facsimile: (562) 216-8495 pgleason@gleasonfavarote.com tfavarote@gleasonfavarote.com 9 10 11 12 13 14 Attorneys for Defendant CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC (formerly CCA of Tennessee, LLC) 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation to Continue Filing Date of Motion for Preliminary Approval 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 The parties to above-captioned matter, by and through their respective attorneys of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: WHEREAS, on November 30, 2018, the parties agreed to settle this matter on terms that are different than those the Court previously refused to accept; and WHEREAS, because the end of the class period agreed upon by the parties is February 28, 2019, the parties could not obtain complete payroll and time keeping data for currently employed class members until after that date; and WHEREAS, on January 22, 2019, the Court ordered the unopposed motion for preliminary approval of class action settlement to be filed no later than March 29, 2019; WHEREAS, on March 27, 2019, based on a stipulation submitted by the parties, the Court continued the deadline for plaintiff to file the motion for preliminary approval to April 29, 2019; and WHEREAS, since March 27, 2019, Defendant has continued to work diligently to compile time keeping data through February 28, 2019; and WHEREAS, compiling the time-keeping data in an electronic format that can be produced to counsel for Plaintiff has taken longer than anticipated because the electronic time records are contained in individual spreadsheets for approximately 1200 individuals, which increased the amount of time it took for Defendant to generate the electronic time records as well as the time it has taken for counsel for Defendant to review the electronic time records and to format the time records so they can be produced to Plaintiff’s counsel by removing the employee name on each time record and replacing it with a DOE designation; and WHEREAS, counsel for Defendant is now in possession of all the of the electronic time records and has produced them to Plaintiff’s counsel on April 29, 2019; and WHEREAS, the time keeping data is necessary for Plaintiffs’ counsel to prepare the unopposed motion for preliminary approval of class action settlement; and WHEREAS, the sheer volume of the data within the excel sheets has taken longer than expected to combine and analyze; and 27 28 Stipulation to Continue Filing Date of Motion for Preliminary Approval 3 1 2 3 WHEREAS, the parties agree that it is in each of their best interest to continue the current deadline for Plaintiffs to file their unopposed motion for preliminary approval of class action settlement to allow Plaintiffs to analyze the newly-produced data. 4 5 6 7 8 NOW THEREFORE, THE PARTIES STIPULATE and agree that good cause exists to continue the deadline for Plaintiffs to file their unopposed motion for preliminary approval of class action settlement to June 14, 2019. Dated: May 8, 2019 THE DION-KINDEM LAW FIRM 9 BY: 10 11 /S PETER R. DION-KINDEM PETER R. DION-KINDEM, P.C. PETER R. DION-KINDEM Attorney for Plaintiff Jose Gonzalez 12 13 Dated: May 8, 2019 GLEASON & FAVAROTE LLP 14 BY: 15 16 17 /S/ PAUL M. GLEASON PAUL M. GLEASON TOREY JOSEPH FAVAROTE Attorneys for Defendant CoreCivic, Inc. formerly known as Corrections Corporation of America 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation to Continue Filing Date of Motion for Preliminary Approval 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 ORDER Having reviewed the above Stipulation to Continue the Filing Date of Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement and finding good cause for the relief requested therein, the Court orders that the deadline for Plaintiffs to file their unopposed motion for preliminary approval of class action settlement is hereby continued to July 15, 2019. The Court does not anticipate again extending this deadline. 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 Dated: 10 May 10, 2019 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation to Continue Filing Date of Motion for Preliminary Approval 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?