Chicago Title Company v. Performance Welding & Machine, Inc. et al.
Filing
10
ORDER Directing Disbursement of Funds and Closing Case, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/28/17. CASE CLOSED. (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY, a
California corporation,
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
No. 1:16-cv-01899-DAD-EPG
ORDER DIRECTING DISBURSEMENT OF
FUNDS AND CLOSING CASE
v.
PERFORMANCE WELDING &
MACHINE, INC., a Nevada corporation,
BRITZ AG FINANCE CO., INC., a
California corporation; U.S.
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY–
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE;
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FRANCHISE
TAX BOARD; and DOES 1-20, inclusive,
Defendants.
20
21
This interpleader action was filed in Fresno County Superior Court in April 2016. (Doc.
22
No. 1-1.) The complaint alleges plaintiff was named as trustee under a deed of trust for a
23
property owned by defendant Performance Welding and foreclosed upon in November 2015. (Id.
24
at 6–7.) After payment to the beneficiary and associated fees, a balance of $106,330.22
25
remained, in which each of the defendants may have had some interest or lien. (Id.) Plaintiff
26
thereafter filed this action and deposited the remaining funds with the Fresno County Superior
27
Court. (See Doc. No. 1-1.) The matter was removed to this court by defendant Department of the
28
Treasury on December 20, 2016 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1442(a)(1). (Doc. No. 1.) Defendant
1
1
Britz expressly disclaimed any interest in the funds in a filing submitted to the Fresno County
2
Superior Court. (See Doc. No. 7-1.) Default was entered against defendants Performance
3
Welding and California’s Franchise Tax Board (“FTB”) in the state court on October 11, 2016.
4
(Doc. No. 7-2.)
5
On February 24, 2017, plaintiff and defendant Department of the Treasury filed a
6
stipulation that this action be dismissed and the remaining funds be distributed to defendant
7
Department of the Treasury. (Doc. No. 9.) The stipulation recounts that, on December 28, 2016,
8
counsel for plaintiff also independently contacted the FTB to ensure the state tax board’s default
9
was not an oversight, and was informed that it was not an oversight and the FTB believes the
10
federal tax lien has priority. (Id. at ¶ 11.)
11
Given the foregoing:
12
1. The funds deposited with the Fresno County Superior Court totaling $106,330.22, plus
13
all accrued interest, shall be disbursed to the United States, payable to “United States Department
14
of Justice” and mailed to Paul T. Butler, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Tax Division, Civil
15
Trial Section (Western), P.O. Box 683, Washington, D.C., 20044;
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
2. Plaintiff is discharged for any and all liability in this action with respect to the
$106,330.22 interplead with the Fresno County Superior Court;
3. The court will retain jurisdiction over the action to the extent necessary to enforce the
parties’ stipulation;
4. This action is dismissed and the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
February 28, 2017
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?