Guru Ram Das Academy Inc. v. John Kerry
ORDER Requiring Plaintiff to File an Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to Defendants' Request for Extension of Time signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 03/01/2017. (Flores, E)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
GURU RAM DAS ACADEMY INC.,
ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE
AN OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF
NON-OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’
REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME
Case No. 1:16-cv-01906-AWI-SAB
JOHN KERRY, et al.,
(ECF No. 11)
FIVE DAY DEADLINE
This action was filed on December 20, 2016 pursuant to the Administrative Procedures
18 Act, 5 U.S.C. §706 et. seq. On February 28, 2017, Defendants filed a motion for an extension of
19 time to file a responsive pleading.
The Local Rules provide that all motions shall be noticed on the motion calendar of the
21 assigned judge and the responding party shall file an opposition or statement of non-opposition
22 fourteen days prior to the noticed hearing date. L.R. 230(a)(b). In this instance, Defendants state
23 that the motion is unopposed. The Court will not require a noticed motion, but will require
24 Plaintiff to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion for an extension of
Alternately, the Local Rules provide that an initial 28 day extension of time to respond to
27 the complaint may be filed without approval of the Court and all other extensions of time must
28 be approved by the court. L.R. 144(a). If the request for an extension of time is unopposed,
1 Defendants may withdraw the motion and the parties may file a stipulation which the Court will
2 approve upon receipt.
Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within five (5) days of the date
4 of entry of this order, Plaintiff shall file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the
5 motion for an extension of time to file a responsive pleading.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
March 1, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?