Guru Ram Das Academy Inc. v. John Kerry
Filing
19
ORDER STRIKING 17 Second Amended Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 5/24/17. (Marrujo, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
GURU RAM DAS ACADEMY INC.,
12
Plaintiff,
13
Case No. 1:16-cv-01906-AWI-SAB
ORDER STRIKING SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT
v.
(ECF No. 17)
14
15
JOHN KERRY, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff filed the complaint in this action on December 20, 2016. (ECF No. 1.) On
18 February 14, 2017, Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint. (ECF No. 7.) Plaintiff filed a
19 second amended complaint on May 23, 2017. (ECF No. 17.)
20
Amendment of the complaint is governed by Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Civil
21 Procedure which provides that a party may amend the party’s pleading once as a matter of course
22 at any time before a responsive pleading is served. Otherwise, a party may amend only by leave
23 of the court or by written consent of the adverse party, and leave shall be freely given when
24 justice so requires. Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a).
25
Plaintiff has previously filed a complaint which is allowed as matter of course and
26 therefore must either get the written consent of the opposing party or seek leave from the Court
27 to file a second amended complaint. Plaintiff did not file a written stipulation to amend nor was
28 leave sought from the Court to file a second amended complaint.
1
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s second amended complaint is HEREBY STRICKEN FROM
1
2 THE RECORD for failure to comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5 Dated:
May 24, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?