G.1., et al. v. City Of Fresno, et al.
Filing
69
ORDER FOLLOWING STATUS CONFERENCE SETTING PRETRIAL CONFERENCE AND TRIAL DATES signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 10/20/2022. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that a pretrial conference is set for February 10, 2023, at 1:30 p.m., in Courtroom 4 before the Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston. A trial is set for April 3, 2023, at 8:30 a.m., in Courtroom 4, before the Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston.(Gonzales, V)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
A. G.1.. et al.,
12
13
14
15
Case No. 1:16-cv-01914-JLT-SAB
Plaintiffs,
v.
CITY OF FRESNO, et al.,
ORDER FOLLOWING STATUS
CONFERENCE SETTING PRETRIAL
CONFERENCE AND TRIAL DATES
(ECF No. 67))
Defendants.
16
17
18
On appeal, the Ninth Circuit upheld the granting of summary judgment on all grounds
19
except for an issue relating to the negligence theory. (See, e.g., ECF No. 45.) The mandate
20
issued on May 28, 2020. (ECF No. 43.) The Court held a scheduling conference on June 30,
21
2020, and set a dispositive motion filing deadline of October 1, 2020. (ECF Nos. 47, 48.) On
22
July 6, 2020, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment, and on October 1, 2021, the
23
District Judge denied Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. (ECF Nos. 49, 55.) The Court
24
thereafter set a settlement conference, and on February 22, 2022, the parties attended a settlement
25
conference before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe, however, the parties did not reach
26
settlement. (ECF No. 64.) No trial date is currently set. Since the date of the settlement
27
conference, the parties have not filed any other documents in this action, and on October 20,
28
2022, the Court held a status conference to discuss the status of this matter. (ECF No. 67.)
1
1
2
Pursuant to the matters discussed at the status conference, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED
that:
3
1.
A pretrial conference is set for February 10, 2023, at 1:30 p.m., in Courtroom 4
before the Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston; 1 and
4
5
2.
6
A trial is set for April 3, 2023, at 8:30 a.m., in Courtroom 4, before the
Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston.
7
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
October 20, 2022
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
The parties shall file a Joint Pretrial Statement pursuant to Local Rule 281(a)(2). The parties are further directed to
submit a digital copy of their Pretrial Statement in Word format, directly to District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston’s
chambers by email at JLTorders@caed.uscourts.gov. Counsels’ attention is directed to Rules 281 and 282 of the
Local Rules for the Eastern District of California, as to the obligations of counsel in preparing for the pre-trial
conference. The Court will insist upon strict compliance with those rules. In addition to the matters set forth in the
Local Rules, the Joint Pretrial Statement shall include a Joint Statement of the Case to be used by the Court to explain
the nature of the case to the jury during voir dire.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?