Jackson v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
19
ORDER Re Consent or Decline Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 11/14/17: 5-Day Deadline. (Hellings, J)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DONALD JACKSON,
12
Plaintiff,
13
Case No. 1:16-cv-01917-SAB
ORDER RE CONSENT OR DECLINE
MAGISTRATE JUDGE JURISDICTION
v.
FIVE DAY DEADLINE
14
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,
15
Defendant.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
On December 23, 2016, Plaintiff Donald Jackson (“Plaintiff”) filed this action seeking
judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner” or
“Defendant”) denying his application for disability benefits pursuant to the Social Security Act.
On January 18, 2017, initial case documents issued, including the order re consent. Plaintiff
consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge on March 23, 2017. Although Plaintiff has
consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge, Defendant did not return the form
indicating whether or not she is willing to consent to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1.
Within five (5) days from the date of service of this order, Defendant may
complete and return the Consent to Assignment or Request for Reassignment
form;
28
1
2.
1
If Defendant does not return the Consent to Assignment or Request for
2
Reassignment form in compliance with this order, this action will be assigned to a
3
district judge for issuance of findings and recommendations; and
3.
4
Defendant is advised that she is free to withhold consent or decline magistrate
jurisdiction without adverse substantive consequences.
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8 Dated:
November 14, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?