Donna M.B. Anderson v. Adams et al
Filing
22
SECOND ORDER Directing Clerk of Court to Return Service Documents to Plaintiff signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 3/22/2017. (Jessen, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DONNA M.B. ANDERSON,
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
v.
DARRELL ADAMS, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:16-cv-01931-DAD-SAB (PC)
SECOND ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF
COURT TO RETURN SERVICE DOCUMENTS
TO PLAINTIFF
Plaintiff Donna M.B. Anderson is appearing pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42
U.S.C. § 1983.
19
On March 20, 2017, this Court received service of process documents from Plaintiff.
20
However, by order filed February 3, 2017, Plaintiff was informed that the Court is required to screen
21
the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, and the Court cannot and will not order service of the
22
complaint until the complaint is screened and found to state a cognizable claim. On February 6, 2017,
23
the Court directed the Clerk of Court to return the service documents to Plaintiff for resubmission if
24
and when necessary. The Court has yet to screen the complaint and therefore submission of the
25
service of process documents is again premature. Therefore, the Court will direct the Clerk of Court
26
to return the service documents to Plaintiff. Because the Court is required to pay the necessary
27
postage fee to return the documents to Plaintiff by mail, Plaintiff is advised that future submission of
28
the service documents prior to an order by the Court directing such documentation be submitted will
1
1
result in disposal of the documents without consideration or retention by the Court. Accordingly, the
2
Clerk of Court is HEREBY ORDERED to return the service of process documents received on March
3
20, 2017, to Plaintiff.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
Dated:
7
March 22, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?