Gillespie v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 14

Stipulation and Order to extend time, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 9/19/2017. ( Responses due by 10/6/2017) (Rosales, O)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 14 MICHAEL GILLESPIE, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO.: 1:16-cv-01937-EPG STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND TIME NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel, that the time for Defendant to serve her response to appellant's letter brief on appellant be extended fourteen (14) days from September 5, 2017, until and including September 19, 2017. This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time. Counsel for the Defendant failed to note the correct date on his calendar when the response was 26 27 28 1 1 due. All subsequent due dates will be extended by fourteen (14) days. Counsel apologizes to 2 Plaintiff, Plaintiff’s Counsel, and the Court for any inconvenience cause by this delay. 3 4 Dated: September 15, 2017 /s/ Steven G. Rosales 5 STEVEN G. ROSALES, 6 (As authorized via e-mail on September 14, 2017) 7 Attorney for Plaintiff 8 9 10 Dated: September 15, 2017 Respectfully submitted, 11 12 PHILLIP A. TALBERT 13 United States Attorney 14 DEBORAH L. STACHEL 15 Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX 16 Social Security Administration 17 18 By: /s/ Ben A. Porter 19 BEN A. PORTER 20 Special Assistant U.S. Attorney 21 Attorneys for Defendant 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 ORDER 1 2 Based on the above stipulation, Defendant’s request for a 14-day extension to serve her 3 response to Plaintiff’s letter brief is granted. All subsequent due dates will also be extended by 4 fourteen (14) days. 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 19, 2017 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?