Trendsettah USA, Inc. et al v. Swisher International, Inc.
Filing
10
ORDER Denying as Moot Defendant's 9 Application for an Order to Show Cause, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 4/17/16. CASE CLOSED. (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
TRENDSETTAH USA, INC., and TREND
SETTAH, INC.,
10
Plaintiffs,
11
v.
12
13
ORDER DENYING AS MOOT
DEFENDANT'S APPLICATION FOR AN
ORDER TO SHOW
(Doc. 9)
SWISHER INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
Defendant.
14
15
Case No. 1:16-mc-00006-SKO
_____________________________________/
On January 21, 2016, Defendant Swisher International (“Swisher”) filed an “Application
16
17 for an Order Directing Nonparties to Appear and Show Cause Why They Should Not be Held in
18 Civil Contempt for Failing to Appear for Deposition and/or Failing to Produce Documents”
19 (Application for OSC) and set a hearing for February 24, 2016. (Doc. 1.) Due to the status of the
20 underlying litigation in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, Case No.
21 8:14-cv-1664-JVS (DFMx), Defendant’s application for an order to show cause re compliance
22 with Rule 45 subpoenas was held in abeyance. (Doc. 9.)
23
The underlying litigation has proceeded to trial, and any enforcement proceeding related to
24 the third-party subpoenas issued in that case is, therefore, moot. As such, Defendant's application
25 is denied as moot, and this case shall be closed.
26
27
IT IS SO ORDERED.
28 Dated:
April 17, 2016
/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
1
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?