Phariss v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 16

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL 15 signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 9/7/2017. CASE CLOSED. (Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Young Cho Attorney at Law: 189870 Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing 12631 East Imperial Highway, Suite C-115 Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 Tel.: (562) 868-5886 Fax: (562) 868-5491 E-mail: rohlfing.office@rohlfinglaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Scott William Phariss 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION 11 12 13 14 SCOTT WILLIAM PHARISS, 15 Plaintiff, 16 vs. 17 18 NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 19 20 Defendant. ) Case No.: 1:17-cv-00001-JLT ) ) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL ) (Doc. 15) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 21 22 23 24 TO THE HONORABLE JENNIFER L. THURSTON, MAGISTRATE JUDGE OF THE DISTRICT COURT: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Scott William Phariss 25 (“Plaintiff”) and Nancy A. Berryhill as the Acting Commissioner of Social 26 Security (“Defendant”), that this matter be dismissed with prejudice, each party to 27 28 -1- 1 bear its own fees, costs, and expenses. The parties enter into this stipulation 2 pursuant to the terms of F.R.Civ.P. Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and 41(a)(1)(B). 3 DATE: September 6, 2017 Respectfully submitted, 4 LAW OFFICES OF LAWRENCE D. ROHLFING 5 /s/ Young Cho BY: __________________ Young Cho Attorney for plaintiff Scott William Phariss 6 7 8 DATE: September 6, 2017 9 PHILIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney /s/ Beatrice Na* 10 BEATRICE NA Special Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (*Per e-mail authorization from Carolyn B. Chen, Assistant Regional Counsel) 11 12 13 14 15 16 ORDER 17 18 IT IS SO ORDERED. 19 20 Dated: September 7, 2017 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?