Agha-Khan v. Bank of America et al

Filing 46

ORDER Pursuant to Status Conference re Criminal Contempt, signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 3/22/2017. Status Conference set for 4/11/2017 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4 (LJO) before Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 6 IN RE THE CONTEMPT OF SALMA AGHAKHAN, Plaintiff 1:17-CV-011-DAD ORDER PURSUANT TO STATUS CONFERENCE RE CRIMINAL CONTEMPT 7 8 On February 9, 2017, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause re Criminal Contempt (“OSC”), 9 10 explaining that the Court “the Court will hold a hearing to determine whether Plaintiff should be held in 11 criminal contempt for the language contained in [her] filings in this case.” Doc. 4 at 1. The Court set a 12 status conference for the matter on March 22, 2017. Doc. 22. At the status conference, the U.S. Attorney’s Office stated that it is still evaluating whether it 13 14 will proceed with the Court’s request to prosecute Plaintiff for contempt, and requested more time to 15 commit. 16 As explained on the record in open Court during that status conference, Plaintiff emailed the 17 undersigned’s judicial assistant on the morning of March 22, 2017,1 stating: “This request for injunctive 18 relief [attached as a PDF document] was filed with Ninth Circuit on March 06, 2017. A copy was mailed 19 to Judge O’Neill. Thus today's hearing Re: Criminal Contempt should be off the calendar. Also Appeal 20 was sent to Supreme Court for filing.” The undersigned’s judicial assistant responded: “Filing the 21 motion does not stay the proceedings in this court. Please be advised, if you do not appear for your 22 hearing today, Judge O’Neill will be issuing a bench warrant for your arrest.” Plaintiff responded: 23 “Thanks. But he has no jurisdiction as he is not a Judge on my case. So he is acting as an individual and 24 25 1 The email chain between Plaintiff and the undersigned’s judicial assistant are attached to this Order. 1 1 2 3 4 is threatening me. This is what I was told by certain investigating authorities.” Plaintiff did not appear at the status conference. Accordingly, the Court issued a warrant for her arrest with bail set at $50,000. The Court will hold a status conference for April 11, 2017, at 10:00A.M. to discuss the U.S. 5 Attorney’s Office’s prosecutorial position and how the parties intend to proceed. The Plaintiff is 6 encouraged to have counsel at that hearing. 7 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____ March 22, 2017 UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 2 Page 1 of 1 Re: FYI Salma Agha to: NHayen 03/22/2017 08:57 AM Hide Details From: Salma Agha <salmahagha@aol.com> To: NHayen@caed.uscourts.gov History: This message has been forwarded. Thanks. But he has no jurisdiction as he is not a Judge on my case. So he is acting as an individual and is threatening me. This is what I was told by certain investigating authorities. -----Original Message----From: NHayen <NHayen@caed.uscourts.gov> To: Salma Agha <salmahagha@aol.com> Sent: Wed, Mar 22, 2017 7:46 am Subject: Re: FYI Dr. Agha-Khan, Filing the motion does not stay the proceedings in this court. Please be advised, if you do not appear for your hearing today, Judge O'Neill will be issuing a bench warrant for your arrest. Natalie A. Hayen Judicial Assistant and Staff Attorney to Chief District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill Robert E. Coyle United States Courthouse 2500 Tulare Street Fresno, California 93721 559.499.5793 From: Salma Agha <salmahagha@aol.com> To: nhayen@caed.uscourts.gov Date: 03/22/2017 06:26 AM Subject: FYI Good Morning, This request for injunctive relief was filed with Ninth Circuit on March 06, 2017 A copy was mailed to Judge O'Neill. Thus today's hearing Re: Criminal Contempt should be off the calendar. Also Appeal was sent to Supreme Court for filing. Thanking You, Salma Agha-Khan, MD.[attachment "Appeal_Doc60_Emergency_Motiion_TRO_3_6_2017.pdf" deleted by Natalie Hayen/CAED/09/USCOURTS] 3/22/2017

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?