Bisel v. Fisher et al
ORDER DENYING 1 Motion for the Appointment of Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 1/6/2017. (Jessen, A)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
GREGORY EUGENE BISEL,
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL
1:17 -cv-00013 SKO (HC)
RAY FISHER, JR., et al.,
Petitioner has requested the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no
absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See, e.g., Anderson v.
Heinze, 258 F.2d 479, 481 (9th Cir. 1958); Mitchell v. Wyrick, 727 F.2d 773, 774 (8th Cir.
1984). However, Title 18 U.S.C. ' 3006A(a)(2)(B) authorizes the appointment of counsel
at any stage of the case if "the interests of justice so require." See Rule 8(c), Rules
Governing Section 2254 Cases. In the present case, the Court does not find that the interests
of justice require the appointment of counsel at the present time. Accordingly, IT IS
HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's request for appointment of counsel is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
January 6, 2017
Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?