Williams v. US Med, LLC

Filing 7

ORDER GRANTING 6 Stipulation to Extend Time for Defendant US MED, LLC to Respond to the Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 2/16/2017. (Hall, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

BLANK ROME LLP
Ana Tagvoryan (SBN 246536)
[e-mail]
Safia Gray Hussain (SBN 251123)
[e-mail]
2029 Century Park East, 6th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 424.239.3434
Attorneys for Defendant,
US MED, LLC
Todd M. Friedman (SBN 216752)
[e-mail]
Meghan E. George (SBN 274525)
[e-mail]
Adrian R. Bacon (SBN 280332)
[e-mail]
LAW OFFICES OF TODD M. FRIEDMAN, P.C.
21550 Oxnard St., Suite 780
Woodland Hills, CA 91367
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 866.633.0228
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
LEEROY WILLIAMS

15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

17
18
19
20

LEEROY WILLIAMS, individually and on Case No. 1:17-cv-00014-DAD-JLT
behalf of all others similarly situated,
STIPULATION AND ORDER
Plaintiff,
EXTENDING TIME FOR
DEFENDANT US MED, LLC TO
vs.
RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT

21

US MED, LLC; DOES 1 through 10,
inclusive,

22

(Doc. 6)

Defendants.

23
24
25
26
27
28
149802.00601/105116336v.1

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT

1

Plaintiff LEEROY WILLIAMS (“WILLIAMS”) and Defendant US MED, LLC

2

(“US MED”), by and through their undersigned counsel, stipulate and agree as

3

follows:

4
5
6

WHEREAS, US MED’S response to the Class Action Complaint (“Complaint”)
filed by WILLIAMS currently is due on February 17, 2017; and
WHEREAS, WILLIAMS and US MED have agreed to extend the time for US

7

MED to respond to the Complaint by three (3) weeks, to and including March 10,

8

2017, in order to allow US MED’S counsel, which was recently retained, an

9

opportunity to review the matter and prepare a response; and

10
11

WHEREAS, WILLIAMS and US MED have not obtained any other extension
of time for US MED to respond to the Complaint;

12

NOW, THEREFORE, WILLIAMS and US MED stipulate as follows:

13

The deadline for US MED to respond to the Complaint is extended to and

14
15

including March 10, 2017.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.

16
17

DATED: February 15, 2017

18

LAW OFFICES OF TODD M. FREIDMAN, P.C.
By: /s/ Adrian R. Bacon
(as authorized on February 15, 2017)
Adrian R. Bacon
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
LEEROY WILLIAMS

19
20
21
22

DATED: February 15, 2017

BLANK ROME LLP

23
24
25

By: /s/ Ana Tagvoryan
Ana Tagvoryan
Attorneys for Defendant,
US MED, LLC

26
27
28

1
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT

1

ORDER

2

Based upon the stipulation of counsel (Doc. 6), the deadline for the defendant to file its

3

responsive pleading is extended 21 days1.

4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

6

February 16, 2017

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1

Counsel were entitled to stipulate to extend the deadline by up to 28 days without approval of the Court. L.R. 144(a).
However, rather than leaving counsel wondering, the Court signs the proposed order provided.

2
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT