Boyd v. Commissioner of Social Security
ORDER REQUIRING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY TO FILE A COPY OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD THAT COMPLIES WITH THE SCHEDULING ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 5/30/2017. Within seven (7) days from the date of service of this order, the Commissioner shall file a copy of the administrative record in OCR format in this action.(Hernandez, M)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DEVON MICHAEL BOYD,
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
Case No. 1:17-cv-00021-SAB
ORDER REQUIRING COMMISSIONER OF
SOCIAL SECURITY TO FILE A COPY OF
THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD THAT
COMPLIES WITH THE SCHEDULING
(ECF No. 9)
This action was filed on January 5, 2017. On January 9, 2017, the scheduling order
19 issued requiring “The administrative record shall only be filed electronically and, to the
20 extent practicable, provided in Optical Character Recognition (“OCR”) format.” (ECF No.
21 5 at 2:5-8 (emphasis in original).)
On May 16, 2017, in Davis v. Commissioner of Social Security, 1:16-cv-00777-SAB, the
23 Court recognized that beginning around October 2016, the administrative records were often not
24 filed in OCR format in Social Security cases.
The Court issued an order requiring the
25 Commissioner of Social Security to file a copy of the administrative record in OCR format in
26 that action and verify that the transcripts in all actions pending before the undersigned have been
27 filed in the correct format. That order was to apply to all future social security cases before the
28 undersigned unless otherwise ordered.
On May 23, 2017, the Commissioner filed the administrative record in the instant case.
2 (ECF No. 9.) However, it is not in OCR format. The Court shall require the Commissioner to
3 file a copy of the administrative record in OCR format in this action.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within seven (7) days from the date of
5 service of this order, the Commissioner shall file a copy of the administrative record in OCR
6 format in this action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
May 30, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?